- 1. Robot stations. (score: 1)
- Author: tree@cmicro.com (Larry Tyree)
- Date: Fri Jul 30 14:07:52 1993
- Well, as someone who has done this, I would make the following proposal: 1. Pick a contest and sponsor a robot category. It wouldn't have to be done as part of the official contest, but could be done
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-07/msg00247.html (6,726 bytes)
- 2. Robot stations. (score: 1)
- Author: len@ariel.coe.neu.edu (Leonard Kay)
- Date: Fri Jul 30 18:28:59 1993
- [......] No CQing allowed? This seems too restrictive considering we already have many multi-multi 'robots', and this is also the only method available to those without computer-controlled rigs (rea
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-07/msg00248.html (7,621 bytes)
- 3. Robot stations. (score: 1)
- Author: dcurtis@mipos2.intel.com (Dave Curtis)
- Date: Fri Jul 30 17:17:17 1993
- [...] Do I detect the sounds of a gauntlet rattling to the turf? He's right, you know. Can we be ready for FD '94? How 'bout it, gang? -Dave ng0x/6
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-07/msg00249.html (6,611 bytes)
- 4. Robot stations. (score: 1)
- Author: K2MM@MasPar.COM (K2MM@MasPar.COM)
- Date: Fri Jul 30 18:32:59 1993
- Tree: Are you in control of your kids just because you begat them? Len: My friend Joe/WA2SPL had to apply for an STA to run unattended HF packet on 40m. Seems like unattended robot contesting would
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-07/msg00250.html (6,635 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu