- 1. WPX CW SCORE (score: 1)
- Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup)
- Date: Mon May 29 22:55:02 1995
- Well, here's my puny WPX score to match the puny band conditions! 184 QSOs X 163 mults = 81,989 points. I was single-op, low-power, on 40, 20, 15 and 10 mtrs. 10 hours of operation. My best band was
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-05/msg00035.html (60,451 bytes)
- 2. WPX CW Score (score: 1)
- Author: WD8AUB@delphi.com (WD8AUB@delphi.com)
- Date: Wed Jun 1 21:12:02 1994
- WD8AUB Single op Single Band Score for 15 meters only: 363 q and 236 prefixs for approximately 103,000 points. Conditions were terrible in Ohio on 15 meters. Highlight was JR3CDC called me scatter an
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-06/msg00004.html (10,635 bytes)
- 3. Wpx cw score (score: 1)
- Author: chuck.kraly@quelle.com (chuck.kraly@quelle.com)
- Date: Wed Jun 8 00:31:01 1994
- STEVE, KM0L, WANTED ME TO PASS HIS WPX CW SCORE ON TO THE REFLECTOR. HE WAS HIGH-POWER SINGLE OP ASSISTED ALL-BAND. 1057 QSO'S AND 544 PREFIXES = 1,016,763 POINTS. ALSO THERE WASN'T MUCH ACTIVITY FRO
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-06/msg00023.html (26,543 bytes)
- 4. Wpx cw score (score: 1)
- Author: chuck.kraly@quelle.com (chuck.kraly@quelle.com)
- Date: Wed Jun 8 18:15:46 1994
- HERE IS ANOTHER SCORE FROM THE KC DX CLUB. KC0EI SINGLE OP HIGH POWER UNASSISTED ALL BAND 513 QSO'S-275 PREFIXES = 162,250 POINTS 73 ES HOPE ALL DID OK IN THE CONTEST CONSIDERING CONDX. DE CHUCK/N0BI
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-06/msg00024.html (13,472 bytes)
- 5. WPX CW Score (score: 1)
- Author: 72610.1361@CompuServe.COM (TOM TAORMINA)
- Date: Sun May 30 23:51:44 1993
- K5XI, Multi-Single (K5XI, K5RC, K7GM, K5TU, WT5U) 2322Q X 816M = 4.8M The first real test for the new 20 and 15 meter stacks. They do work! 73 and DX, Tom, K5RC
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00196.html (5,969 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu