- 1. rhummel@monad.net (Rob Hummel): [CQ-Contest] WPX 0-point discussion (score: 1)
- Author: n4kg@juno.com (T. A. Russell)
- Date: Thu Apr 3 07:41:07 1997
- Please don't count me as one of those lobbying to change the WPX 0-point rule. As 2-time LP/AB champ, I see nothing wrong with the way the scoring is now. (OF COURSE YOU DON'T....WITH A RARE PREFIX,
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-04/msg00031.html (9,020 bytes)
- 2. rhummel@monad.net (Rob Hummel): [CQ-Contest] WPX 0-point discussion (score: 1)
- Author: rhummel@monad.net (Rob Hummel)
- Date: Thu Apr 3 20:23:46 1997
- NK4G has some comments on my feelings about 0-pt QSOs. Trey also questioned some of my opinions. Here's some illumination. Some real vacuous statements here. 1. Unfair advantage? Hardly. I EARNED tha
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-04/msg00041.html (9,939 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu