Mail Archive Search: <+from:Gilmer>

Results:

References: [ +from:Gilmer: 102 ]

Total 102 documents matching your query.

81. [ct-user] CT 9.39 Post-contest outputs (score: 1): Author: Gilmer, Mike" <mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 08:47:19 -0500; I'm confused (go figure) - it seems both WRITELOG and WRITEARRL create the correct *.LOG file for ARRL. A DOS FileCompare shows no differences. The other files seem the same, too (.sum, .brk, etc.) .; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-03/msg00060.html (6,910 bytes)
82. [ct-user] Which CT files to ARRL? (score: 1): Author: Gilmer, Mike" <mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:14:25 -0500; Careful - there are separate email addresses for the different ARRL contests now e.g., DXCW@arrl.org and DXPhone@arrl.org etc. 73 Mike N2MG -- Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com Administrative reque; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-03/msg00068.html (9,797 bytes)
83. [ct-user] Which CT files to ARRL? (score: 1): Author: Gilmer, Mike" <mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:39:18 -0500; The ARRL website says nothing (that I can find easily) about requiring an electronic dupe sheet for ARRL DX. For paper logs >500 QSOs, yes. Mike N2MG -- Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com Administra; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-03/msg00069.html (9,508 bytes)
84. FW: [ct-user] CT939 crashes where CT910a works (score: 1): Author: Gilmer, Mike" <mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 16:19:35 -0500; -- Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@contesting.com WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ct/ Questions: owner-ct-user@contesting.com; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-03/msg00074.html (8,347 bytes)
85. [ct-user] Which CT files to ARRL? (score: 1): Author: Gilmer, Mike" <mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 09:54:30 -0500; Yes, nothing like a web site or magazine that isn't up-to-date with the parent organization! You may submit your contest entry via the ARRL BBS (860-594-0306), via Internet to contest@arrl.org or ano; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-03/msg00079.html (10,148 bytes)
86. [ct-user] Which CT files to ARRL? (score: 1): Author: Gilmer, Mike" <mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 13:26:20 -0500; Well, the ARRL representative at a February radio club meeting said to send logs to the contest-specific address if going by email. Since the only plaque I expect is on my teeth, I'm not worried; so; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-03/msg00083.html (11,129 bytes)
87. [ct-user] ARRL Contest Email (score: 1): Author: Gilmer, Mike" <mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 14:30:04 -0500; ARRL says contest@arrl.org WILL work, but not to use it. Use the contest-specific addresses. They'd naturally prefer the logs to be sorted based on the contest. Saves them a LOT of work. As we all kn; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-03/msg00084.html (7,414 bytes)
88. [ct-user] Ethernet TSR using PCMCIA cards (score: 1): Author: Gilmer, Mike" <mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 09:17:19 -0500; Also try www.crynwr.com for a broad assortment - no guarantees! -- Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@contesting.com WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ct/ Quest; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-02/msg00020.html (7,843 bytes)
89. [ct-user] Ethernet TSR using PCMCIA cards (score: 1): Author: Gilmer, Mike" <mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 13:23:59 -0500; Here's another site with goodies for Ethernet http://castor.acs.oakland.edu/cgi-bin/vsl-front Mike N2MG -- Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@contesting.com; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-02/msg00021.html (7,469 bytes)
90. [ct-user] COMTSR settings vs. CT settings (score: 1): Author: Gilmer, Mike" <mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 09:58:20 -0500; I am confused as to the requirements for setting baud/bits/parity, etc. when setting up CT with COMTSRs. It seems somewhat redundant and potentially fatal that both the COMTSR and CT have selections/; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-02/msg00034.html (7,756 bytes)
91. [ct-user] Band Map and CT939 (score: 1): Author: Gilmer, Mike" <mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 12:12:18 -0500; Before I write up my observations regarding the use of CT9.39 in ARRL CW, I would like to hear, briefly and in private, from anyone who had problems with using the Band Map. Specifically, did anyone; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-02/msg00066.html (6,887 bytes)
92. [ct-user] VGA (score: 1): Author: Gilmer, Mike" <mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 13:49:41 -0500; Any one out there use the VGA switch for CT (9.39)? Any problems? Mike N2MG -- Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@contesting.com WWW: http://www.contesting.c; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-02/msg00068.html (6,796 bytes)
93. [ct-user] CT9.39 (score: 1): Author: Gilmer, Mike" <mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 15:37:38 -0500; It's OK Mike. I started operating with 9.38B and then installed 9.39. My "problems" remained. To those who have responded so far, let me be clear! My problems were with the Band Map (BM) and not the; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-02/msg00071.html (8,485 bytes)
94. [ct-user] 9.39 (score: 1): Author: Gilmer, Mike" <mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 16:06:44 -0500; Yes, this is another of the "manifestations" I alluded to in my longer email. Sounds like it may be TS-940 related... -- Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@c; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-02/msg00073.html (7,414 bytes)
95. [ct-user] CT 9.39 and Band Map (score: 1): Author: Gilmer, Mike" <mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 09:02:17 -0500; Yes, this describes what appears to be a work-around. But it is only a work-around. I will try this method during ARRL SSB (and before!) Better that it be more intuitive and idiot (me) proof! In gene; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-02/msg00086.html (10,367 bytes)
96. [ct-user] CT9.39 Misc observations (score: 1): Author: Gilmer, Mike" <mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 10:30:00 -0500; Observations - If anyone know what I may have done "wrong" please let me know. 1. CW STATUS window: ALT-K (for keyboard) should bring up CW Status window (or change cursor or something) to alert user; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-02/msg00087.html (9,535 bytes)
97. [ct-user] Tab vs. Spacebar (score: 1): Author: Gilmer, Mike" <mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 14:05:55 -0500; Mike, Forgive the dumb question, but why do you use the <TAB> key instead of the <SPACEBAR>? I think alot of what you see in the above would not occur. I used the BM with my OMNI-VI, and didn't reall; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-02/msg00089.html (8,101 bytes)
98. [ct-user] CT 9.39 and Band Map (score: 1): Author: Gilmer, Mike" <mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 17:25:55 -0500; In this case, since I'll take credit (or blame) for starting the BandMap issue, I state for the record that I have a legal copy of 9.37 - purchased a few weeks ago. I downloaded 9.39 from the vault.; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-02/msg00093.html (9,264 bytes)
99. [ct-user] drivers (score: 1): Author: Gilmer, Mike" <mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 12:57:13 -0500; I have several used Compaq 486-level PCs (Presario 486/33 model 3060) that have network cards installed (that say DIGITAL on them). The hard disks were erased clean (by the company who used to owned; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-01/msg00034.html (6,960 bytes)
100. [ct-user] CT 938 and TS940 interface (score: 1): Author: Gilmer, Mike" <mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 08:41:00 -0500; I cannot get 9.38Beta or 9.37(b) to talk to my TS940. Having not used CT in a while I'm not sure what may have changed WRT radio interfaces. My ancient 7.24 seems to work just fine - ruling out the P; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-01/msg00039.html (6,960 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]