Mail Archive Search: <+from:gdaught6@leland.stanford.edu>

Results:

References: [ +from:gdaught6@leland.stanford.edu: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] icom 756 pro II ? (score: 1): Author: gdaught6@leland.stanford.edu (George T. Daughters); Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 08:37:43 +0008; Hi, I've been using CT v9.65 with my ICOM 738 very successfully. My wife bought me a new 756 Pro II (How cool is that lady?!) I notice that the 756 Pro (without the II) is a CT 9.65 choice, but when; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-08/msg00020.html (6,740 bytes)
2. [ct-user] ct 9.65 & ic 756 pro-II (score: 1): Author: gdaught6@leland.stanford.edu (George T. Daughters); Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 08:10:07 -0700; Thanks to those who responded to my query about getting CT v9.65 to work with my new 756 Pro-II. The solution was: 1) Select IC 756 Pro on the CT9.65 radio list, and 2) Change the address of the Pro-; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-08/msg00021.html (6,512 bytes)
3. [ct-user] Voice DVP, DVK, W9XT or Kenwood DRU?? (score: 1): Author: George T. Daughters" <gdaught6@leland.Stanford.EDU (George T. Daughters); Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 08:46:37 +0008; Hi all, I bought one. I bought the cables. I plugged it in. I ran DVPTSR. Everything worked perfectly, the first time. It continues to do so. I would definitely do it again, the same way! 73, George; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-04/msg00018.html (8,008 bytes)
4. [ct-user] Re: CT 9.39 and ICOM radio control (score: 1): Author: George T. Daughters" <gdaught6@leland.Stanford.EDU (George T. Daughters); Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 09:41:17 +0008; Hi all, It has been written... I don't know what "totally broken" means, but I downloaded 9.39 and tried it last night in setting up for arrl dx phone. Icom 738 (told CT it was a 737) on com1, IBM 48; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-03/msg00010.html (8,141 bytes)
5. [ct-user] CT 93.9 scoring bug?! (score: 1): Author: George T. Daughters" <gdaught6@leland.Stanford.EDU (George T. Daughters); Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 15:48:51 +0008; Hi contesters, Please tell me it's my problem alone!!! If you use CTv9.39 and did a "Writelog" at the end of your WPX effort, you might have done better than you think! If I total the points from eac; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-03/msg00139.html (7,622 bytes)
6. [ct-user] DVP problem (score: 1): Author: gdaught6@leland.Stanford.EDU (gdaught6@leland.Stanford.EDU); Date: Sun, 1 Nov 1998 12:26:38 +0000; hi dave, yes!! it happened to me with CT9.37, but not with 9.26. i have the k1ea dvp board, and have never had ANY trouble of any kind with it until this! i found that "pre-recorded" messages had thi; /archives//html/CT-User/1998-11/msg00005.html (8,278 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]