Mail Archive Search: <+from:k4oj@tampabay.rr.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:k4oj@tampabay.rr.com: 67 ]

Total 67 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [ct-user] Finding Six Banders? (score: 1): Author: "Jim White, K4OJ" <k4oj@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 15:36:49 -0500; Excel rules, dude... Open up your cabrillo log file with Excel... it will first tell you it is not an Excel document and it will ask your help in assigning the tabular information to the data - you c; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-10/msg00060.html (11,075 bytes)
62. Re: [ct-user] Com Port Keying (score: 1): Author: "Jim White, K4OJ" <k4oj@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 00:32:55 -0500; I beg to disagree, Hans.... This evening I saw two different xcvrs being keyed by CT-Win, hopefully we will have a lot more! Info: computers are smaller Pentium units off eBay - 200+ MHz....o/s Win 9; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-11/msg00070.html (8,892 bytes)
63. Re: [ct-user] Com Port Keying (score: 1): Author: "Jim White, K4OJ" <k4oj@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 00:36:06 -0500; OOOOOOPS - just saw the title of your posting - our rigs are keyed using the LPT ports Why would you want to use the com ports? All the support stuff like PTT and paddle is on the LPT line! Is there; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-11/msg00071.html (9,848 bytes)
64. Re: [ct-user] 9.92.001 keying & cty.dat corrections (score: 1): Author: "Jim White, K4OJ" <k4oj@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 18:40:49 -0500; lemme ask this - if I deleted a previous response to this one, sorry.... For the TO4E and TO4WW operations is the correct "patch" TO4E=FR/G and TO4WW=FR/G? Thanks, Jim, K4OJ Team W1CW Jim Reisert AD1; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00002.html (8,138 bytes)
65. Re: [ct-user] CT Win Cursor (score: 1): Author: "Jim White, K4OJ" <k4oj@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 21:14:20 -0500; Heah we agree on something, Al The cursor on CTWIN is essentially imperceptible... hope you filed a complaint at the CT web site! 73, Jim, K4OJ Alan Harp wrote: I've used CTWIN a couple of times now.; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00021.html (7,645 bytes)
66. Re: [ct-user] Support for NAQP - Wanted ??? (score: 1): Author: "Jim White, K4OJ" <k4oj@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 18:16:20 -0500; What do you guys have against NA? It works just like CT, and is even easier to use in the sense that you do not have to do those comtsr's - set it and forget it... Oh that's right - these are hams...; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00075.html (9,189 bytes)
67. Re: [ct-user] Support for NAQP - Wanted ??? (score: 1): Author: "Jim White, K4OJ" <k4oj@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 21:41:13 -0500; N7MAL wrote: This is so far out of line it is disgusting: "Oh that's right - these are hams... now that Ken has made CT freeware you want him to add more contests to it too so you do not have to buy; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00080.html (10,543 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 67
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]