Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k4sb@earthlink.net: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [ct-user] Experience with CT win - crashes? power needed? (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 13:26:51 +0000
-- Just a guess, but some of the older pentiums have a "type a matic speed" setting in the BIOS. I think the max on one of mine is 30 characters per second. Might check that out. 73 Ed ______________
/archives//html/CT-User/2003-09/msg00023.html (7,315 bytes)

2. Re: [ct-user] Finding Six Banders? (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 05:35:10 +0000
Well, to keep it as simple as possible, let's assume you have some form of BASIC on your machine. FIRST! Make a BACKUP of your log. Now, edit your cabrillo log and remove everything from the header a
/archives//html/CT-User/2003-10/msg00064.html (8,794 bytes)

3. Re: [ct-user] CT 9.92.001 Slow down (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 04:08:11 +0000
This is common. You simply cannot run Windows with that amount of memory, especially when you consider you must keep your networking status. As an example, my shack machine is a PIII @ 400 mHz. Dual
/archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00054.html (8,413 bytes)

4. Re: [ct-user] CT 9.92.001 Slow down (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 04:20:53 +0000
I just made a post on memory, but the faster processor is simply not needed. Think about it, you have a machine capable of making 133,000,000 calculations per second. But, it can't run on 16 mb of m
/archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00055.html (8,440 bytes)

5. Re: [ct-user] CT 9.92.001 Slow down (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:37:22 +0000
-- Jim is right on the button. But, when I ordered 512 MB of memory from Tigerdirect.com, they mentioned memory prices are going UP. No reason given... As for those older shorter memory chips, I hav
/archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00063.html (8,853 bytes)

6. Re: [ct-user] Support for NAQP - Wanted ??? - REPLY (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 23:19:17 +0000
snipped-- -- Gentlemen. enough is enough. And while I do value your comments on the reflecter, I am sick and tired of this flaming. And I DO know how to set my filters. 73 Ed _______________________
/archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00094.html (8,905 bytes)

7. Re: [ct-user] TS-570D Interface (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:02:47 +0000
Nice web site by John. Especially interesting is his most recent survey, CW speeds used. 73 Ed _______________________________________________ CT-User mailing list CT-User@contesting.com http://list
/archives//html/CT-User/2004-01/msg00057.html (6,595 bytes)

8. Re: [ct-user] CT Clock (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 18:56:41 +0000
I've never run into this problem, but I make it a habit to resync the clock in Windows after I shut down for awhile. As I think I have mentioned, I also have a spare HD with only MSDOS 6.22 and othe
/archives//html/CT-User/2004-02/msg00048.html (7,800 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu