Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n0nb@networksplus.net: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] CT-DOS 9.77 mode changes when band changed (score: 1)
Author: n0nb@networksplus.net (Nate Bargmann)
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 11:00:53 -0500
Hi All. Just completed IARU and noticed a peculiarity. Any time the band was changed in CT it always changed the mode to CW (which cheered one op) even though it had been on SSB before. If it was alr
/archives//html/CT-User/2002-07/msg00044.html (7,847 bytes)

2. [ct-user] CT-DOS 9.77 mode changes when band changed (score: 1)
Author: n0nb@networksplus.net (Nate Bargmann)
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 11:34:42 -0500
(Yes, replying to one's post is bad form...) To answer one query I received already, CT was configured for Mixed mode as I recall. 73, de Nate >> -- Wireless | Amateur Radio Station N0NB | "We have a
/archives//html/CT-User/2002-07/msg00047.html (7,402 bytes)

3. [ct-user] CT-DOS 9.77 mode changes when band changed (score: 1)
Author: n0nb@networksplus.net (Nate Bargmann)
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 19:37:08 -0500
* JohnEvans <jvevans@mail.his.com> [2002 Jul 14 19:30 -0500]: Well, John (hey we worked you several times, at least I did--K0RH), I had selected Mixed mode and the first time I encountered the proble
/archives//html/CT-User/2002-07/msg00048.html (8,625 bytes)

4. [ct-user] Urgent help needed! (score: 1)
Author: n0nb@networksplus.net (Nate Bargmann)
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 20:24:21 -0500
* Cahaba Internet <cahaba@cahaba.net> [2002 Jun 23 16:27 -0500]: Backups. ;-) If you are lucky, the original FD2002.BIN file may still be intact on the disk, provided too many new files haven't been
/archives//html/CT-User/2002-06/msg00035.html (8,543 bytes)

5. [ct-user] CW, CT and the FT1000MP (score: 1)
Author: n0nb@networksplus.net (Nate Bargmann)
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 18:41:06 -0600
* Scott Nichols <snichols@mvosprey.com> [2002 Feb 19 18:26 -0600]: Hi. Scott. Do you use a different interface with CT and the other programs? If so, do they use the same port, e.g. LPT1, COM1, etc.?
/archives//html/CT-User/2002-02/msg00055.html (8,604 bytes)

6. [ct-user] network problems (score: 1)
Author: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@networksplus.net> (Nate Bargmann)
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 22:04:41 -0500
Are the cards daisy-chained through RG-59 cable or are you using a hub with either BNC or RJ045 connectors? If you're using a hub, I'd suspect that. 73, de Nate >> -- Wireless | Amateur Radio Station
/archives//html/CT-User/2001-08/msg00026.html (6,980 bytes)

7. [ct-user] Field Day Success!! (score: 1)
Author: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@networksplus.net> (Nate Bargmann)
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 19:23:08 -0500
I must add that 9.63 was solid for us as well. We ran 1A with one computer, so we didn't use too many features, just logging and CW keying. We did have one "strange" happen. This morning I was asked
/archives//html/CT-User/2001-06/msg00079.html (8,513 bytes)

8. [ct-user] cw lock-up (score: 1)
Author: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@networksplus.net> (Nate Bargmann)
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 21:15:09 -0600
Saul. When you say it locks up in CW mode, are talking about when you start CT? I've noticed CT will key the radio when it starts, so I just press <Esc> and it unkeys and normal operation can proceed
/archives//html/CT-User/2000-11/msg00073.html (8,544 bytes)

9. [ct-user] Cabrillo and Soapbox Comments? (score: 1)
Author: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@networksplus.net> (Nate Bargmann)
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 13:14:02 -0600
Here is an excerpt from the confirmation email I received from ARRL after submitting my SSCW log: "Time-on and time-off reporting is not required for logs submitted in the Cabrillo format. This messa
/archives//html/CT-User/2000-11/msg00128.html (9,419 bytes)

10. [ct-user] Re: Cabrillo and time ON/OFF (score: 1)
Author: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@networksplus.net> (Nate Bargmann)
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 15:56:03 -0600
Read my reply again. I addressed both issues. I'm quoting the ARRL there. Have a beef? Take it up with them, n1nd@arrl.org I abide by the same rules as everyone else. 73, de Nate >> -- Wireless | Ama
/archives//html/CT-User/2000-11/msg00134.html (8,681 bytes)

11. [ct-user] Cabrillo and Soapbox Comments? (score: 1)
Author: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@networksplus.net> (Nate Bargmann)
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 16:08:26 -0600
AFAIK, this is a matter you'll need to take up with n1nd@arrl.org I simply relayed text from the auto-responder that is quoted above. Apparently, ARRL has decided on some method of calculating ON/OFF
/archives//html/CT-User/2000-11/msg00135.html (10,507 bytes)

12. [ct-user] Cabrillo and Soapbox Comments? (score: 1)
Author: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@networksplus.net> (Nate Bargmann)
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 19:30:55 -0600
That's not in dispute. However, when you submit your log via email I bet you receive the same text in the confirmation email as I did Saturday stating that manually listing on/off times when submitti
/archives//html/CT-User/2000-11/msg00139.html (9,941 bytes)

13. Re: [ct-user] 991.003 (score: 1)
Author: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@networksplus.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 15:47:53 -0600
* wo2n <wo2n@att.net> [2003 Nov 16 15:33 -0600]: RF? FYI, we've been using 9.91.003 without issue since the start of SS. No radio, rotor, and using a voice keyer on LPT1. 73, de Nate >> -- Wireless |
/archives//html/CT-User/2003-11/msg00044.html (7,035 bytes)

14. Re: [ct-user] 991.003 (score: 1)
Author: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@networksplus.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 21:16:05 -0600
* wo2n <wo2n@att.net> [2003 Nov 16 20:36 -0600]: ^^^^^ I'd not considered that. We were running on a machine with MS-DOS 7.0 73, de Nate >> -- Wireless | Amateur Radio Station N0NB | Successfully Mic
/archives//html/CT-User/2003-11/msg00047.html (7,568 bytes)

15. Re: [ct-user] manual (score: 1)
Author: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@networksplus.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 18:04:25 -0600
* Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu> [2003 Dec 31 08:23 -0600]: Pardon me, but wouldn't cross-platform graphics like .jpg or .png be better than some MS only format? So far as I know, either o
/archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00119.html (8,431 bytes)

16. Re: [ct-user] Running DOS on New Computers - Solved! (score: 1)
Author: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@networksplus.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 22:06:51 -0500
* Alan Harp <k4pb@arrl.net> [2005 Jul 02 17:35 -0500]: Welcome to the upgrade treadmill. Bill needs your money! 73, de Nate >> -- Wireless | Amateur Radio Station N0NB | Successfully Microsoft Amateu
/archives//html/CT-User/2005-07/msg00018.html (8,271 bytes)

17. Re: [ct-user] CT Keyboard Key Covers (score: 1)
Author: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@networksplus.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 22:26:59 -0600
* Hugh Valentine <hsvdds@juno.com> [2006 Mar 01 12:05 -0600]: Sadly, Oklahoma Comm Center went out of business several years ago (1997 if I recall). Searching for "high-rate products" in Google retur
/archives//html/CT-User/2006-03/msg00001.html (8,690 bytes)

18. Re: [ct-user] LCD Monitor type for CT? (score: 1)
Author: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@networksplus.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 18:29:00 -0600
* Rich Hallman - N7TR <rich@n7tr.com> [2006 Mar 18 10:19 -0600]: I haven't roamed all the bands with due diligence, but where I have been I haven't noticed anything from my Samsung SyncMaster 710n. I
/archives//html/CT-User/2006-03/msg00038.html (7,746 bytes)

19. Re: [ct-user] CT-DOS (score: 1)
Author: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@networksplus.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 21:43:19 -0600
* hank k8dd <k8dd@arrl.net> [2007 Nov 07 21:33 -0600]: Yes, but without continual updates, it will become less useful. If a contest changes rules, then CT may become less useful for that particular e
/archives//html/CT-User/2007-11/msg00023.html (9,597 bytes)

20. Re: [ct-user] CT-DOS (score: 1)
Author: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@networksplus.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 18:41:55 -0600
* N7MAL <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET> [2007 Nov 09 17:12 -0600]: I first ordered a copy of CT back in '93 after working my first phone SS and logging on paper! I entered all of the QSOs in post contest mode. S
/archives//html/CT-User/2007-11/msg00034.html (8,247 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu