- 1. [ct-user] CQP and latest Ver CT ( DOS ) - Busted ??? (score: 1)
- Author: "Dennis Vernacchia" <n6ki73@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 18:16:57 -0700
- Got all set up to run CQP and get to find out that latest DOS Version on Web Site has a very bad bug !!! There is no field for the SERIAL Number, the program defaults to 59 or 599 in that field and w
- /archives//html/CT-User/2007-10/msg00003.html (6,986 bytes)
- 2. Re: [ct-user] CQP and latest Ver CT ( DOS ) - Busted ??? (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob Wilson, N6TV" <n6tv@arrl.net>
- Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 21:41:26 -0700
- If like me you used CT or CTWin in the California QSO Party, and plan to use the free KA5WSS LogConv 1.73b program to create a Cabrillo file from the BIN file (because CT doesn't create a complete Ca
- /archives//html/CT-User/2007-10/msg00004.html (9,986 bytes)
- 3. Re: [ct-user] CQP and latest Ver CT ( DOS ) - Busted ??? (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob Wilson, N6TV" <n6tv@arrl.net>
- Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 22:58:25 -0700
- I just realized that you can find these mixed-up QSOs easier by looking at Logfile.ALL for "3500, 7000, 14000, 21000, etc." The band is correct. So if you use something like the WT4I log converter to
- /archives//html/CT-User/2007-10/msg00005.html (8,444 bytes)
- 4. Re: [ct-user] CQP and latest Ver CT ( DOS ) - Busted ??? (score: 1)
- Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
- Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 06:15:03 -0000
- I've been a registered user since the very beginning of CT. Now I only use it for SS, CQDX, ARRLDX, ARRL & CQ 160, and ARRL 10. If there are any major rule/scoring changes to any of those contests I'
- /archives//html/CT-User/2007-10/msg00006.html (9,169 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu