Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+CT\,\s+Ethernet\,\s+Packet\,\s+etc\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+CT\,\s+Ethernet\,\s+Packet\,\s+etc\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] CT, Ethernet, Packet, etc (score: 1): Author: Cooper, Stewart" <coopersg@odl.co.uk (Cooper, Stewart); Date: Wed, 10 Sep 1997 13:48:26 0000; For information, in response to our our own group's (GM7V) requirements, and to some questions on this reflector: I have just run a test with 5 PCs running CT 9.27. PC #1 - Windows 95 486/33 running; /archives//html/CT-User/1997-09/msg00019.html (8,956 bytes)
2. [ct-user] CT, Ethernet, Packet, etc (score: 1): Author: David Robbins <k1ttt@berkshire.net> (David Robbins); Date: Wed, 10 Sep 1997 23:31:09 +0000; it may be that the tnc's aren't handling the ct backbone very well. the ct backbone messages are fairly short, usually less than 80 bytes and contain a checksum character that may look like an odd co; /archives//html/CT-User/1997-09/msg00020.html (8,562 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]