Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+CT\s+9\.27\s+stable\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+CT\s+9\.27\s+stable\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] CT 9.27 stable? (score: 1): Author: barry@w2up.wells.com (barry); Date: Tue, 16 Jul 96 13:27:34 EDT; Hi all -= I've been using 9.20 for a while, and wonder if there's any reason to (or not to) get 9.27 which I believe is the latest. Only problem I've noticed with 9.20 is in IARU the Check Call windo; /archives//html/CT-User/1996-07/msg00026.html (7,319 bytes)
2. [ct-user] CT 9.27 stable? (score: 1): Author: kb2hun@wizvax.net (William R Liporace); Date: Wed, 17 Jul 1996 13:54:56 -0400 (EDT); William Liporace KB2HUN kb2hun@wizvax 763 Huntingdon Drive KB2HUN @ K2TR (yccc packet cluster) Niskayuna, NY 12309 KB2HUN @ WA2PVV (NEDA) 518-346-3804 home 518-471-2837 work -- Submissions: ct-user@v; /archives//html/CT-User/1996-07/msg00027.html (7,189 bytes)
3. [ct-user] CT 9.27 stable? (score: 1): Author: gswanson@arrl.org (Swanson, Glenn, KB1GW); Date: Wed, 17 Jul 1996 15:56:00 -0400; My copy of CT 9.27 was stable. Although, I noted the minor "check call" bug described below, too. --Glenn, KB1GW "I also noticed the wrong band was highlighted in the check call." KB2HUN -- To: <ct-u; /archives//html/CT-User/1996-07/msg00028.html (8,221 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]