Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+CT\s+Network\s+Question\s+\-\s+LONG\s+runs\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+CT\s+Network\s+Question\s+\-\s+LONG\s+runs\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] CT Network Question - LONG runs? (score: 1): Author: Gary K9GS" <GaryK9GS@wi.rr.com (Gary K9GS); Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 00:01:37 -0500; Currently using a CT Ethernet network with six PC's on a 10-base 2 coax network. I want to add a 7th computer which is ~ 2,000 feet away. There is an existing cable bundle of twisted pair running bet; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-10/msg00054.html (7,536 bytes)
2. [ct-user] CT Network Question - LONG runs? (score: 1): Author: Robert J. Curci" <n2xr@home.com (Robert J. Curci); Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 14:48:42 -0400; Sure, you can get a "media converter" . It's like a balun for converting 10baseT to 10base2. They are about $90 or so. Or you can get a small hub that has a 10base2 uplink. 73 de Bob n2xr -- Original; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-10/msg00055.html (8,634 bytes)
3. [ct-user] CT Network Question - LONG runs? (score: 1): Author: Filip Jonckers <fjonckers@Interconnect.be> (Filip Jonckers); Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 22:13:49 +0200; We at OTxL are using UTP cabling with great success ! It's cheap, and my experience is that it has much less problems with EMI/RFI than RG-58 thinnet ethernet Of course everything depends upon the qu; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-10/msg00056.html (7,942 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]