Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+CT\s+and\s+Cabrillo\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+CT\s+and\s+Cabrillo\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] CT and Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: Joe Stepansky <joe@microserve.net> (Joe Stepansky); Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 07:12:34 -0500; I noticed that CT 9.48 WRITELOG created a KQ3F.LOG file. I thought this might be a Cabrillo formatted file, but when I look at it, the layout doesn't match what appears on page 102 in the November 19; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-02/msg00058.html (7,058 bytes)
2. [ct-user] CT and Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: Ken Wolff" <kwolff@ultranet.com (Ken Wolff); Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 08:03:14 -0500; The .LOG file is the old ARRL format. The .TXT file is the new Cabrillo format. - Ken I noticed that CT 9.48 WRITELOG created a KQ3F.LOG file. I thought this might be a Cabrillo formatted file, but w; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-02/msg00059.html (7,820 bytes)
3. [ct-user] CT and Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: Geovincent@aol.com (Geovincent@aol.com); Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 16:19:43 EDT; Can anyone tell me if the latest version of CT 9.45 produces files in the new Cabrillo format that ARRL wants? TNX and 73 George KF3BE -- Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com Administrative requests:; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-10/msg00137.html (7,023 bytes)
4. [ct-user] CT and Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: Robert Naumann" <n5nj@att.net (Robert Naumann); Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 21:33:12 -0000; The ARRL does not "want" the new format files yet. They will accept them if you send them that way but the new format will not be required until next year. Robert E. Naumann N5NJ / V26O Plano, TX USA; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-10/msg00138.html (7,190 bytes)
5. [ct-user] CT and Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu> (Jim Reisert AD1C); Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 22:11:55 -0400; Actually, the ARRL does not *REQUIRE* the new format yet. However, I'll bet they DESIRE logs in the Cabrillo format NOW, in order to test/debug the log checking software. The ARRL *will* require the; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-10/msg00142.html (7,758 bytes)
6. [ct-user] CT and Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: Kennamer, Bill, K5FUV" <bkennamer@arrl.org (Kennamer, Bill, K5FUV); Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 08:49:24 -0400; ARRL prefers the Cabrillo format now if you have it available. We will accept the old format this year, but it is not the preferred one. 73 Bill Kennamer K5FUV Membership Services Manager ARRL -- Sub; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-10/msg00146.html (7,049 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]