Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+IARU\s+writearrl\s+and\s+date\s+$9\.45$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+IARU\s+writearrl\s+and\s+date\s+$9\.45$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] IARU writearrl and date (9.45) (score: 1): Author: kb3aug@juno.com (kb3aug@juno.com); Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 20:42:23 -0400; When I do a writearrl the date comes out as, 08/07/100. Is it ok to submit it this way? The ARRL asks for no headers or page breaks correct? If I do a writelog the dates are correct. With either one; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-07/msg00056.html (7,183 bytes)
2. [ct-user] IARU writearrl and date (9.45) (score: 1): Author: Geovincent@aol.com (Geovincent@aol.com); Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 09:49:10 EDT; My dates came out as ddmmyy 08/07/00 and 09/07/00. This is acceptable. When I converted to adif to import my log into my logging program all dates were correct. TNX and 73, George K3GV DX: Long may i; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-07/msg00057.html (7,010 bytes)
3. [ct-user] IARU writearrl and date (9.45) (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu> (Jim Reisert AD1C); Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 09:58:47 -0400; The Y2K fixes came out in a later version of CT - try downloading 9.50 from the web site. 73 - Jim -- Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu> http://www.ad1c.com -- WWW: http://www.k1ea.com/ Submis; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-07/msg00058.html (7,528 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]