Trying to figure out how to map these calls to get credit for separate mults. I tried full call mapping, but the program treats "ND5S" as the defining part of the call. How did others treat this situ
I wondered the same thing, but during the contest it appeared that multiplier credit was given. After the contest, I looked at the .ALL file, I see that both FJ and PJ7 multiplier credit was given fo
CT counted the multiplier OK, but came up with dupes for the second round of QSO's with ND5S. How to fix this is the only question. file, calls -- WWW: http://www.k1ea.com/ Submissions: ct-user@conte
I changed a "DUPE" entry from PJ7/ND5S to PJ7/ND5S/PJ7 in the CT log entry and the DUPE disappeared and the multiplier credit was given. I tried changing it to ND5S/PJ7, but that, too, resulted in a
I logged the second call as "PJ7/ND5S/P" and it credited both points and mult OK. I will delete the "/P" from the Cabrillo printout before sending to the league. Not an elegant solution, but it IS a
Does it make a difference, as long as the official scorers (ARRL) score it properly? The Cabrillo log doesn't show dupes. -- WWW: http://www.k1ea.com/ Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com Administrati
Author: Mike Gilmer - N2MG <n2mg@contesting.com> (Mike Gilmer - N2MG)
Date: 20 Feb 2001 05:01:33 -0800
I agree with Ed. This is all pretty moot. The log checking process will not only take care of dupes (or non-dupes) with NO PENALTY, it will also take care of multipliers. Of course, it'd be nice if t
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C" <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert AD1C)
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 18:58:40 -0500
There is no need to worry about the duping of the calls. CT will export QSO data into the Cabrillo log without any indication of dupes. 73 - Jim AD1C -- Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Ch