Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+Multi\-multi\s+serial\s+numbers\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+Multi\-multi\s+serial\s+numbers\.\.\.\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] Multi-multi serial numbers... (score: 1): Author: Mel Martin <mel@interlink.net> (Mel Martin); Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1998 06:26:07 -0400; Assigning serial numbers "sequencially" is actually impossible in a multi-multi. Any real solution will lead to out of sequence numbers being re-assigned from time to time. Perhaps some thought shoul; /archives//html/CT-User/1998-10/msg00004.html (7,940 bytes)
2. [ct-user] Multi-multi serial numbers... (score: 1): Author: Alastair Beaton" <beaton@wintermute.co.uk (Alastair Beaton); Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1998 12:49:19 +0100; 1. Because it gives you more data to copy correctly (increasing the "challenge") 2. Because, in the days of all-paper logs, it was much easier and faster to check logs against serial numbers than ag; /archives//html/CT-User/1998-10/msg00005.html (8,791 bytes)
3. [ct-user] Multi-multi serial numbers... (score: 1): Author: Jim Pratt <n6ig@netcom.com> (Jim Pratt); Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1998 09:25:12 -0700 (PDT); Given a fast enough and robust enough network, there is no reason why sequential numbers couldn't be assigned given the proper coding. Contest rules. But most contests with serial numbers that I oper; /archives//html/CT-User/1998-10/msg00006.html (8,840 bytes)
4. [ct-user] Multi-multi serial numbers... (score: 1): Author: Mel Martin <mel@interlink.net> (Mel Martin); Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 14:13:19 -0400; It's not a question of "fast enough" or "robust enough". It's a question of logic... exactly when do you assign the number... no matter when you decide to do it, there is always situations where some; /archives//html/CT-User/1998-10/msg00007.html (9,386 bytes)
5. [ct-user] Multi-multi serial numbers... (score: 1): Author: Bill Bennett N7DZ <WizardOfAz@Cyberdude.com> (Bill Bennett N7DZ); Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 12:05:24 -0700; Although others surely have much more experience and have thought about this more, I still can't resist putting down my thoughts on this. The topic sure is getting plenty of attention. This problem d; /archives//html/CT-User/1998-10/msg00008.html (10,160 bytes)
6. [ct-user] Multi-multi serial numbers... (score: 1): Author: David Robbins <k1ttt@berkshire.net> (David Robbins); Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 23:30:05 +0000; but it does work with ct... at least in contests where we run m/s like ss with multiple computers it is handled ok as long as you follow the rules. 1. YOU MUST hit insert to send the report. this 're; /archives//html/CT-User/1998-10/msg00011.html (9,434 bytes)
7. [ct-user] Multi-multi serial numbers... (score: 1): Author: Mel Martin <mel@interlink.net> (Mel Martin); Date: Sat, 03 Oct 1998 00:34:45 -0400; I must have missed something David... I've never operated anything other than single op, or multi-op single station, but I was under the impression that m/m did assign from a single pool of numbers.; /archives//html/CT-User/1998-10/msg00012.html (9,095 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]