Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+Re\:\s+WPX\s+M\/S\s+Rules\s+and\s+Contest\s+Software\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+Re\:\s+WPX\s+M\/S\s+Rules\s+and\s+Contest\s+Software\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] Re: WPX M/S Rules and Contest Software (score: 1): Author: K2KW@prodigy.net (K2KW@prodigy.net); Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 18:54:19 -0500; I realize that my suggestion is not 100% compliant with the rules as they are now written... but (some) software programs are not up to date (CT, possibly others). N8BJQ knows that some software is n; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-03/msg00051.html (8,256 bytes)
2. [ct-user] Re: WPX M/S Rules and Contest Software (score: 1): Author: i4ufh@libero.it (Fabio I4UFH); Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 09:27:59 +0100; Ok guys, I supposed that when the rules are written in this clear way there was not another think to do that modifiy the program compling the rules. But if a BJQ clear up suggestion is needed well I; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-03/msg00054.html (10,231 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]