Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+State\s+QSO\s+Party\s+\.dat\s+files\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] State QSO Party .dat files (score: 1)
Author: "John Shannon" <jsk3wwp@alltel.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 12:17:03 -0500
Are there .dat files usable with CT for other state QSO parties available on the Internet somewhere? Before I re-invent the wheel and make up my own, I'd like to know so I can simply download them ra
/archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00066.html (8,230 bytes)

2. Re: [ct-user] State QSO Party .dat files (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 22:41:28 -0500
At 12:17 PM 12/17/2003, John Shannon wrote: Are there .dat files usable with CT for other state QSO parties available on the Internet somewhere? Only FL and CA are directly supported. I'd be happy to
/archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00084.html (7,689 bytes)

3. Re: [ct-user] State QSO Party .dat files (score: 1)
Author: Henry <henry@summitschool.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 23:31:25 -0500 (EST)
I put together the same type of .dat files for the NC QSO party for CT. You have to do some scoring yourself, but it gets the job done, and certainly beats hand loggingTake it from the log checker...
/archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00086.html (8,419 bytes)

4. Re: [ct-user] State QSO Party .dat files (score: 1)
Author: "John Shannon" <jsk3wwp@alltel.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 00:53:13 -0500
Hi Henry, Thanks for the info. I looked it over. I have a suggestion. It might be better using the contest type New England QSO party in CT rather than the California QSO party. Why? You don't have t
/archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00090.html (10,598 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu