Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+V8\s+or\s+V9\s+\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] V8 or V9 ? (score: 1)
Author: Keith M. Hamilton" <khamilton@cisnet.com (Keith M. Hamilton)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 1998 01:11:44 -0500
I am going to purchase CT soon. I want to use it on a 386SX laptop until I can get another computer. Will V9 run acceptably on a 386SX with 4 meg of ram? I hate to by V8 and pay again to upgrade to V
/archives//html/CT-User/1998-02/msg00017.html (7,282 bytes)

2. [ct-user] V8 or V9 ? (score: 1)
Author: Tessei Masuda" <ji6brb@sun-net.or.jp (Tessei Masuda)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1998 09:21:39 +0900
I tested it at last week ARRL CW with CT9.31 on a 386SX (TOSHIBA J3100SX,which name is JA Version) with 4M ram. And it run well except hitting Insert after input CALLSIGN. Whenever I did it , he said
/archives//html/CT-User/1998-02/msg00027.html (7,702 bytes)

3. [ct-user] V8 or V9 ? (score: 1)
Author: Jose R. Hierro" <ea7kw@arrakis.es (Jose R. Hierro)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1998 09:25:07 +0100
Tessei Masuda wrote: . It is a bug (also in version 9.34).Not insert key but "+" key (f3+log_qso). Also happens when correction feature is enabled (corrected call sign + F3 + log_qso). Corrected call
/archives//html/CT-User/1998-02/msg00030.html (7,578 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu