Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+Windows\s+ME\s+\-\s+Anything\s+Further\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+Windows\s+ME\s+\-\s+Anything\s+Further\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] Windows ME - Anything Further? (score: 1): Author: Paul Elliott" <pelliott@maranatha.net (Paul Elliott); Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:58:06 -0400; I looked at the postings on this topic in the archives, and was wondering if anyone has come up with a workaround on this. We're getting a new PC that will have ME on it, and while I could go to the; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-10/msg00027.html (8,860 bytes)
2. [ct-user] Windows ME - Anything Further? (score: 1): Author: dick@pobox.com (dick@pobox.com); Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:29:19 -0500; 10 OCT, 2000 - 1325 CDT Hello Paul... I don't think you can run CT under Windows ME because I am told there is no underlying DOS operating system in this latest version of Microsoft's OS. I am one of; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-10/msg00028.html (9,206 bytes)
3. [ct-user] Windows ME - Anything Further? (score: 1): Author: George Fremin III - K5TR <geoiii@loja.kkn.net> (George Fremin III - K5TR); Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:40:46 -0700; There are several ways around it. DOS is still there - it is just hidden pretty well. (I do not have a version of windows ME yet so I have not tried this.) There is a patch program with step by step; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-10/msg00029.html (9,421 bytes)
4. [ct-user] Windows ME - Anything Further? (score: 1): Author: Paul Elliott" <pelliott@maranatha.net (Paul Elliott); Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:15:05 -0400; Me either, Jim, but the PC is going to come with it installed. While I'm willing to work around it for awhile, it's inevitable that CT will have to move into the full-Windows realm. And yes, I'd be w; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-10/msg00031.html (8,710 bytes)
5. [ct-user] Windows ME - Anything Further? (score: 1): Author: Paul Elliott" <pelliott@maranatha.net (Paul Elliott); Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:17:47 -0400; I've had difficulty getting that to work, with 4 COM and 3 LPT ports, but may try it again. Thanks for the suggestion. Paul N3GPU -- WWW: http://www.k1ea.com/ Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com Admi; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-10/msg00032.html (8,650 bytes)
6. [ct-user] Windows ME - Anything Further? (score: 1): Author: Paul Elliott" <pelliott@maranatha.net (Paul Elliott); Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:23:16 -0400; Thanks Ed - I tried this on another machine, in this case with Win2000 installed, but could not get it to properly recognize all the plug-and-play devices I need (e.g., expansion cards for extra COM; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-10/msg00033.html (8,813 bytes)
7. [ct-user] Windows ME - Anything Further? (score: 1): Author: ContstEmailAlias@aol.com (ContstEmailAlias@aol.com); Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 16:53:13 EDT; If Ken is interested, we'd like to discuss incorporating CT technology into a Logwindows contesting front end. This way, the CT technology could be moved into an already solid Windows market, without; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-10/msg00034.html (8,853 bytes)
8. [ct-user] Windows ME - Anything Further? (score: 1): Author: Bradley Nowak" <bnowak@worldnet.att.net (Bradley Nowak); Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 08:29:32 -0400; Sign me up. Brad - N8SNM If Ken is interested, we'd like to discuss incorporating CT technology into a Logwindows contesting front end. This way, the CT technology could be moved into an already soli; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-10/msg00037.html (9,452 bytes)
9. [ct-user] Windows ME - Anything Further? (score: 1): Author: alsopb <alsopb@gloryroad.net> (alsopb); Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 13:15:24 +0000; Something has been lost: One reason people don't move to something else: 1) The interface will be different. One of the reasons guys stick with CT is that they don't have to learn a new interface. No; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-10/msg00038.html (10,839 bytes)
10. [ct-user] Windows ME - Anything Further? (score: 1): Author: ContstEmailAlias@aol.com (ContstEmailAlias@aol.com); Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 10:42:34 EDT; Brian,. You make quite an assumption here. I'm 40 years old and do wear glasses, and I'm to the point of needing bi-focals, and not some 18 year old internet whiz that has 20/20 vision <grin>. The id; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-10/msg00041.html (10,641 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]