Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+radio\s+communication\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+radio\s+communication\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] radio communication (score: 1): Author: David Robbins <k1ttt@berkshire.net> (David Robbins); Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 00:15:01 +0000; i have noticed that after upgrading from 9.27 to 9.38 the interface between the computer and radio seems to hang up more often. unfortunately this has coincided with upgrades of radios from ts-940's; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-03/msg00036.html (7,868 bytes)
2. [ct-user] radio communication (score: 1): Author: Jim Pratt <n6ig@netcom.com> (Jim Pratt); Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 16:29:38 -0800 (PST); Interesting post. We used 9.37A over the weekend in a two-computer multi-two situation at K6RC. Station one was an FT1000D, station two was an FT1000MP. Station two computer crashed dozens of times o; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-03/msg00038.html (8,736 bytes)
3. [ct-user] radio communication (score: 1): Author: Scott Bullock <sales@advantagecomm.net> (Scott Bullock); Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 19:29:56 -0500; I had problems with CT9.39 crashing all weekend, screen filled up with gobbelgook. I believe it may have been my fault, I think it was when I was in the band map selecting a callsign, and then accide; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-03/msg00039.html (9,698 bytes)
4. [ct-user] radio communication (score: 1): Author: Dave Hawes" <n3rd@ix.netcom.com (Dave Hawes); Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 01:13:49 -0400; At N3RS, we ran a beta version of 9.39, after reporting to Ken that we had serious problems with the first 9.39 with our two IC-775s. He provided an update, which fixed most of the problems 775 relat; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-03/msg00041.html (9,746 bytes)
5. [ct-user] radio communication (score: 1): Author: Robert J. Curci" <n2xr@monmouth.com (Robert J. Curci); Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 21:46:09 -0500; I used 9.39, Icom IC-729 (as an IC-737) with no problems other than if I used CT to change bands the radio would switch from VFO A to VFO B and Back to VFO A again. Albeit on the right freq. but it w; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-03/msg00044.html (9,147 bytes)
6. [ct-user] radio communication (score: 1): Author: Michael McCarthy, W1NR" <w1nr@eecorp.com (Michael McCarthy, W1NR); Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 22:34:38 -0500; In my experience, every time I have had a crash with CT, it was due to RF. 80 meters is prone to crashing the computer at W1BK and 40 was a bugger at my old QTH. I have one interesting problem with m; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-03/msg00045.html (9,263 bytes)
7. [ct-user] radio communication (score: 1): Author: Lawrence G. Dobranski" <va3lgd@amsat.org (Lawrence G. Dobranski); Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 06:27:29 -0500; Micheal: I had similar problems on 20 metres. The radio would go into a feedback loop with the VOX on and be locked in transmit. I diagnosing the problem I disconnected the antenna and installed a du; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-03/msg00046.html (11,160 bytes)
8. [ct-user] radio communication (score: 1): Author: Gilmer, Mike" <mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 08:59:08 -0500; It's not your fault Scott! I think there's a problem with the CT939-to-TS-940 communications especially WRT BandMap functions. I've heard from others with 940s who seem to have similar problems. I'd; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-03/msg00047.html (10,495 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]