Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+we\s+need\s+regression\s+testing\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+we\s+need\s+regression\s+testing\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] we need regression testing (score: 1): Author: psoper@pjs.East.Sun.COM (Pete Soper); Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 14:26:28 -0500; What if each of us ("us" being CT users very interested in its reliability) signed up for a small chunk of CT's functionality and committed to test it within X days of a 9.XXX build being put on the; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-12/msg00099.html (7,120 bytes)
2. [ct-user] we need regression testing (score: 1): Author: k1ea@contesting.com (K1EA); Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 14:56:42 -0500; That would be WONDERFUL! I feel bad about sending out buggy versions, but the only other choice is add no new features at all. If I had some testers, I would send it to them before releasing to the v; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-12/msg00100.html (7,978 bytes)
3. [ct-user] we need regression testing (score: 1): Author: jirka@jimaz.cz (Jiri Sanda); Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 00:57:07 +0100; Hi Ken, I do not think it is a good idea. As is visible hear, the whole crowd is more-less happy with your huge work, and if the people comes with bug reports, it is just great and the more people ge; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-12/msg00101.html (9,334 bytes)
4. [ct-user] we need regression testing (score: 1): Author: wc4h@itis.net (Carl Herrera - WC4H); Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 19:50:11 -0500; WOW Jiri! Because it's for OUR HOBBY you think it's NOT professional!!!! Try using some other software for contesting. On the contrary, CT is TOTALLY PROFESSIONAL!!!!! CT ** IS ** the standard for co; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-12/msg00102.html (8,427 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]