Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*CT\s+support\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. CT support (score: 1)
Author: kr4dl@mindspring.com (Steven R. Schmidt)
Date: Mon, 27 May 1996 11:43:44 -0400
Or lack thereof? I spent the month before the WPX test trying to download the upgrade from the (long distance) bulletin board. It continually showed me as an unregistered user, despite my invoice fro
/archives//html/CT-User/1996-05/msg00016.html (8,231 bytes)

2. CT support (score: 1)
Author: albraun@sockets.net (albraun@sockets.net)
Date: Mon, 27 May 96 18:12:44 +0000
Steve - I've had trouble with their support too. When I went to their booth in Dayton I was "greeted" by a surly LZ1, who, when I asked him if CT had a new update for Dayton like NA did, responded by
/archives//html/CT-User/1996-05/msg00018.html (7,232 bytes)

3. CT support (score: 1)
Author: kf3p@cais.cais.com (Tyler Stewart)
Date: Tue, 28 May 1996 03:19:18 -0400
Well, CT support mostly sucks, but there are plenty of people using it that can help you, and it's far more speedy and somewhat more bug-free than NA. It's also usually one step ahead of NA in PROPE
/archives//html/CT-User/1996-05/msg00019.html (8,274 bytes)

4. CT support (score: 1)
Author: Ai7b@teleport.com (Ai7b@teleport.com)
Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 15:08:28 -0700 (PDT)
ct support contiues to suck....you need to switch to n6tr sw....better product and surely better supported!! -- Submissions: ct-user@ve7tcp.ampr.org Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@ve7tcp.am
/archives//html/CT-User/1996-05/msg00021.html (6,580 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu