Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:andy@multibandcom.com: 78 ]

Total 78 documents matching your query.

21. RE: [Karlnet] Re: [isp-wireless] Re:Anyonehaveexperiencewiththiscombination (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 11:21:27 -0600
Kevin, Does the CPE include wireless card? If so, what type and what power output? Andy Andy, The UBICOM based device (RSU-ANT) will have the ability to do TurboCell and Bridging for 5 users. We are
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00109.html (18,337 bytes)

22. RE: [Karlnet] Re:[isp-wireless]Re:Anyonehaveexperiencewiththiscombination (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 14:53:50 -0600
This isn't the same board as the new WCPE board, is it? Brett, You will have to use a router if you only want to use one IP. ONE WARNING THOUGH- maximum throughput is around 4 mbps. Plenty fast enoug
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00118.html (22,412 bytes)

23. RE: [Karlnet] Reporting SNR Values on KN-200 (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 10:17:57 -0700
hehehe.. Squeaky wheel gets the grease!!! Keep Moaning!!! Ha! That's funny! I too am tired of hearing people moan about SNR values with Senao cards instead of reading through the countless posts that
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-01/msg00035.html (9,700 bytes)

24. RE: [Karlnet] KN-50 capabilities? (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:28:59 -0700
I am reposting this.. Because the last message I read said that someone was using prism cards in KN-50's !!! 1. not right now 2. no 3. it won't - kn-50 is TurboCell only 4. not right now - but they'r
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-01/msg00073.html (11,449 bytes)

25. RE: [Karlnet] Radio Interference from SR-4200? (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 11:02:21 -0700
I have seen this problem in only one instance. I installed an EtherantII to the same mast as the TV antenna is attached. The customer reports problems with only one channel, ABC, and gets poor recept
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00030.html (11,613 bytes)

26. RE: [Karlnet] RE: Locator (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:24:07 -0700
All messages and email addresses come up in a Google search. Just do a search for your name at google and see what comes up. The first 3 links on my name are posts from this mailing list.... And yes.
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00081.html (13,490 bytes)

27. [Karlnet] NAT redirector (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 09:32:03 -0700
Hello all, I was wondering if the NAT redirector is a feature that Karlnet plans on keeping in their software. I can access the NAT redirector (I have yet to find out if it works) if I use the 4.0015
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00103.html (7,602 bytes)

28. RE: [Karlnet] KN-50 capabilities? (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 09:46:46 -0700
Has anyone certified an antenna/radio combination with the KN-50? I have several new questions: 1. Is possible to use KN50 like "true" 802.11b client for standard AP (not AP+)? 2. If yes, is possible
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00122.html (10,528 bytes)

29. RE: [Karlnet] Strange packet loss with older lucent EC (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 20:50:08 -0700
Check the log .. you may find a fatal exception has occurred as a log file entry. Or such has been for quite a number of etherant's with 3com EC's in them. Andy This is probably not the right mailing
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00149.html (9,466 bytes)

30. RE: [Karlnet] Strange packet loss with older lucent EC (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 08:45:46 -0700
We have about 25 lucent EC's on a shelf at the Bozeman office. Sucks that their bandwidth peaks out at 1 mbit outdoors... (typically see more like 500k outdoors) We have replaced many EC's with highe
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00154.html (10,392 bytes)

31. RE: [Karlnet] Chasis for KM-100/200 (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:39:16 -0700
Demarctech.com enclosure. I am probably asking a question that has already been asked. But does anyone know of a good type of chasis for the KM-100/200? We are having a hard time finding a creative w
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00167.html (7,765 bytes)

32. RE: [Karlnet] Reduction of Karlnet features w/out notification. (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 16:56:52 -0700
I don't buy the KN50 boards because I like having a solid outdoor spec. And using higher powered cards is a plus. I figure.. If the customer is in close I just use different combo of card and antenna
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00148.html (12,230 bytes)

33. RE: [Karlnet] Reduction of Karlnet features w/out notification. (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 08:43:54 -0700
Then what is the main difference between the boards? the KN-50 has an outdoor spec. Look at the PDF on Karlnet's website. At least that is what they are claiming. ;) _________________________________
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00166.html (16,140 bytes)

34. RE: [Karlnet] RE: Reduction of Karlnet features w/out notification. (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 08:57:55 -0700
I really haven't seen problems with power over Ethernet yet with carnet devices. We had to replace about 30 YDI etherant's last year due to lightning. All problem customers have since then purchased
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00167.html (11,518 bytes)

35. RE: [Karlnet] RE: Reduction of Karlnet features w/out notification. (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:00:47 -0700
Oops, spell check change Karlnet to Carnet.. hehehe I really haven't seen problems with power over Ethernet yet with carnet devices. We had to replace about 30 YDI etherant's last year due to lightni
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00169.html (11,969 bytes)

36. RE: [Karlnet] Reduction of Karlnet features w/out notification. (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:02:39 -0700
I was wishing that we could get higher processor boards, not lower. If the KN50 board can barely support the current feature set, what happens next year when Karlnet comes out with more features? The
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00170.html (18,394 bytes)

37. RE: [Karlnet] RE: Reduction of Karlnet features w/out notification. (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:09:02 -0700
Ahh.. ok.. I didn't know if the back plate feature was standardized yet. That makes it much more attractive for the under 3 mile scenario. Thanks Andy, You can definitely change the radio in the embe
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00173.html (14,000 bytes)

38. RE: [Karlnet] Reduction of Karlnet features w/out notification. (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:22:47 -0700
What is the breakdown of feature differences? (I bet this has been discussed before, but I will ask anyway) The KN-50 is just a simple client. List price for a COMPLETE unit inside a flat panel anten
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00176.html (19,823 bytes)

39. RE: [Karlnet] Reduction of Karlnet features w/out notification. (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 10:10:01 -0700
We have been using the Etherant for the last 2 years. I wanted something better with throttling. I live in Montana so the environment is challenging enough. (with the exception that we don't have as
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00180.html (18,001 bytes)

40. RE: [Karlnet] KARLNET RESPONSE_ Reduction of Karlnetfeaturesw/outnotification. (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:45:53 -0700
Are there any boards that exceed Karlnet spec with a small form factor and higher powered processor so that we aren't installing boards that will be antiquated by next year, forcing Karlnet to remove
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00241.html (22,284 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu