Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:cwu@cwlab.net: 460 ]

Total 460 documents matching your query.

221. RE: [Karlnet] Drop in Throughput? (score: 1)
Author: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 13:51:23 -0500
in terms of cisco speed, a direct route of 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0 DIRECT 1 is config t int e0/0 ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0 no shutdown does that help? --Original Message-- From: karlnet-
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-07/msg00063.html (16,423 bytes)

222. RE: [Karlnet] Drop in Throughput? (score: 1)
Author: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 13:51:23 -0500
unfortunately, the KarlNet routing documentation is pretty poor (sorry Doug) The network currently is one big bridge network. But we have different subnets in place. So I dont think it is going to be
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-07/msg00064.html (12,666 bytes)

223. RE: [Karlnet] Drop in Throughput? (score: 1)
Author: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 14:06:06 -0500
I'm touched <g> I didn't celebrate the 4th so I could write up a Routing Paper. I hope everyone enjoys: Doug Harman KarlNet, Inc. 525 Metro Place North Suite 100 Dublin, OH 43017 614 822-5275 x 123 6
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-07/msg00067.html (14,459 bytes)

224. RE: [Karlnet] Drop in Throughput? - some routing examples (score: 1)
Author: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 15:21:55 -0500
I'm not sure what your question is if you gave each radio a DIRECT /30, then you wouldn't be able to have more than one Satellite talk to that radio (e.g., you only have 1 IP left w/ the /30) Better
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-07/msg00075.html (11,305 bytes)

225. RE: [Karlnet] Drop in Throughput? - Jim's Network (score: 1)
Author: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 15:52:03 -0500
Jim, per your request earlier this week, I was going to do this offlist, but I thought to post it on here for the benefit of everyone (since you posted your network on here, I don't think yo'd mind m
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-07/msg00077.html (11,929 bytes)

226. RE: [Karlnet] Drop in Throughput? (score: 1)
Author: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 15:55:24 -0500
haha, we uncovered your little scam...you just cut and pasted from the manual <g> -Charles
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-07/msg00078.html (8,233 bytes)

227. RE: [Karlnet] Drop in Throughput? (score: 1)
Author: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 15:54:11 -0500
as long as you don't use your 3.88 satellites as IP routers (e.g., have em do NAT), it won't be a problem Some of the clients running Satellite are still at 3.88. Doesn't this make a difference? All
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-07/msg00079.html (18,976 bytes)

228. RE: [Karlnet] Drop in Throughput? - some routing examples (score: 1)
Author: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 15:57:17 -0500
interface 1 is Ethernet -Charles
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-07/msg00080.html (9,650 bytes)

229. RE: [Karlnet] Drop in Throughput? (score: 1)
Author: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 17:12:27 -0500
none whatsoever just w/ 3.88, CIDR/VLSM is not supported, so IP routing is kind of difficult -Charles
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-07/msg00083.html (8,736 bytes)

230. RE: [Karlnet] Drop in Throughput? - some routing examples (score: 1)
Author: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 17:12:28 -0500
and would those radios be PtP radios? b/c you'd only have one IP to spare w/ a /30 Oops, I should have put interface 2 But basically I was going to add DIRECT routes of /30 for EACH radio Dan Metcalf
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-07/msg00084.html (11,365 bytes)

231. RE: [Karlnet] Drop in Throughput? - some routing examples (score: 1)
Author: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 18:33:09 -0500
but the wireless medium is still shared... -Charles
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-07/msg00086.html (9,753 bytes)

232. RE: [Karlnet] Drop in Throughput? - some routing examples (score: 1)
Author: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 12:17:13 -0500
probably not, as it will end up eating more of your AP's processing power Yes, it is still shared, I was just wondering if there was a benefit for doing it one way or the other? Dan Metcalf Wireless
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-07/msg00094.html (11,369 bytes)

233. RE: [Karlnet] Drop in Throughput? - Jim's Network (score: 1)
Author: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 12:27:16 -0500
your cisco has to advertise its routes also Charles, Thanks, this is great! I hope that it can help others who need answers to the same questions. Another question, though, what do you mean by "rever
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-07/msg00095.html (9,813 bytes)

234. RE: [Karlnet] SNMP Read Password??? (score: 1)
Author: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:04:05 -0500
yeah, been bitching about that for a while, but it's a low priority thing, given all the other bugs that need to/have been fixed -Charles
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-07/msg00103.html (7,209 bytes)

235. RE: [Karlnet] Proper CPE Config? (score: 1)
Author: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 00:31:20 -0500
& no Bridging that is correct yes IP will, if you're doing NAT, you can't give the PC a public IP And and it will soon lock up the most common error, causing this problem is if under IP setup, you f
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-07/msg00111.html (10,034 bytes)

236. RE: [Karlnet] Proper CPE Config? (score: 1)
Author: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 00:37:35 -0500
exposed together also, this configuration, duplicated across your network, eventually corrupts your RG mac tables, and causes the units to lock up - IMO, not recommended -Charles
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-07/msg00112.html (8,396 bytes)

237. RE: [Karlnet] Proper CPE Config? (score: 1)
Author: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 00:37:35 -0500
internal radio IP is the inside IP address under Outgoing NAT config under the setup menu of the configurator (hope that didn't confuse anyone) -Charles
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-07/msg00113.html (8,243 bytes)

238. RE: [Karlnet] PCAnywhere (score: 1)
Author: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 13:14:32 -0500
find what port PCAnywhere uses enable incoming NAT assign the public port to the private IP you're all set -Charles Runing KarlNet 4.02 5 user CPE, CPE has public IP, users have static private IPs. C
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-07/msg00116.html (9,483 bytes)

239. RE: [Karlnet] Bandwidth problems (score: 1)
Author: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 13:17:49 -0500
as in a leaky NAT RG? No shut downs -- these are all full-time radios. Have you ever seen a problem with duplicate NAT addresses? I know it sounds completely off-the-wall, but we have seen problems b
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-07/msg00126.html (11,611 bytes)

240. RE: [Karlnet] Turbocell CPE compatibility (score: 1)
Author: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 22:13:58 -0500
RGs are supported PCI/ISA adaptors are supported through the NDIS USB adaptors are not -Charles We're considering CPE options for our wireless network and are interested in Orinoco gear (RG1x00, USB,
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-07/msg00139.html (7,980 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu