Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com: 640 ]

Total 640 documents matching your query.

301. RE: [Karlnet] KN-50 bugs? (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 10:24:34 -0500
Karlnet - do you have a resolution for the kn50 / Orinoco - problem? _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/list
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00379.html (8,256 bytes)

302. RE: [Karlnet] KN-50 bugs? (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 10:50:16 -0500
Locks up or reboots [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karln
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00382.html (11,469 bytes)

303. RE: [Karlnet] configurator --- (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 17:37:00 -0500
Finally one of my AP's has enough clients to that I have a scroll bar now in the configurator when viewing the turbocell entries -- but now I always have to hit refresh, is there anyway around that?
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00386.html (8,980 bytes)

304. RE: [Karlnet] configurator --- (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 18:26:25 -0500
More than 12 I think [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] bar now I _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/lis
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00387.html (11,245 bytes)

305. RE: [Karlnet] Transfer Rates (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 00:36:50 -0500
Bryan, My network goes likes this <rg1000> <ap1000> <ap1000> <ap1000> -- with customers connected through some of the ap's we are able to pull a full T1 up and down at the same time across the links
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00393.html (16,107 bytes)

306. RE: [Karlnet] Transfer Rates (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 00:49:34 -0500
Also the 1st link from rg to ap and the 2nd link from ap to ap - are completely isolated (RF wise), I also have used the ping test to verify each segment is running 3Mbps/3Mbps [mailto:karlnet-bounce
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00399.html (21,173 bytes)

307. RE: [Karlnet] Transfer Rates (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 00:56:56 -0500
I've only used the KN software, and it supports routing all the way down to the CPE (except the KN50) [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] serious for BH to resolve problem - a was Meter. 2x any th
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00402.html (24,071 bytes)

308. RE: [Karlnet] Transfer Rates (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 10:34:48 -0500
backhauls each 100% John, Something is wrong in your setup, I would start doing tests between each segment using the PING FILL Test inside the configurator -- Verify you are able to pull full speed
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00408.html (9,906 bytes)

309. RE: [Karlnet] Transfer Rates (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 22:22:53 -0500
I the where I pulling You have a 3MB link to the internet? Your testing from which type of PC (xp, 98se?, linux, mac?) how are you testing the 1.2MB? another The 3Mb/s is a result of 1.5Mb + 1.5Mb,
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00412.html (10,528 bytes)

310. RE: [Karlnet] Transfer Rates (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 22:24:11 -0500
another That's a good question and I think that you need resolve your current speed issue before you just throw hardware at it -- but I also think You should replace the rg1000 w/ a KN100, as it sup
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00413.html (9,240 bytes)

311. RE: [Karlnet] Transfer Rates (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 10:03:52 -0500
is via from -80'is But are you using a speed test like bos.speakeasy.net? also win98 has a very low TCP Win, you'll need to adjust that before you'll see any more speeds. fill -1.8MB on do 1.2+ most
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00418.html (10,186 bytes)

312. RE: [Karlnet] Transfer Rates (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 10:04:23 -0500
win98 won't work unless you adjust your TCP WIN values _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00419.html (9,251 bytes)

313. RE: [Karlnet] KN-50's - anyone seen this (score: 1)
Author: <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 09:25:58 -0500
as we were KN-50s. have AP to that I KN-50's right. I have been seeing latency as well, but I wasn't sure what it was.. normally its around 20ms or lower - but since we added a bunch of kn50's and r
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-01/msg00121.html (8,699 bytes)

314. RE: [Karlnet] KN-50's - anyone seen this (score: 1)
Author: <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 09:26:14 -0500
showed Went new channel, follow). related..does boonies we are seeing this same problem and if you let it sit for up to 5 minutes does it come back on its own? Can you do a link test? If you let it
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-01/msg00122.html (8,237 bytes)

315. RE: [Karlnet] KN-50's - anyone seen this (score: 1)
Author: <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 11:10:55 -0500
I wish karlnet would allow us to upgrade the kn50's.... When you switch channel's, you do reboot the AP, do all of your kn50's support autoroam? [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] sure I will the
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-01/msg00124.html (12,666 bytes)

316. RE: [Karlnet] KN-50's - anyone seen this (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 11:21:40 -0500
Kinda of works? It seems to work ok for us.... [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] it? kn50's not channel to station channels worked KN-50's to old didn't the to 5 -- [This E-mail scanned for viru
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-01/msg00127.html (15,668 bytes)

317. RE: [Karlnet] KN-50's - anyone seen this (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 11:24:22 -0500
Renumbered? What do you mean? [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] of sure will the fine. the -- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _______________________________________________ K
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-01/msg00129.html (13,858 bytes)

318. RE: [Karlnet] KN-50's - anyone seen this (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 11:28:06 -0500
I understand that, I think any WISP expects the equipment to work 100%, bugs/failures/problems are not acceptable, I don't have the time or money to be replacing or fixing bugging hardware... I don't
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-01/msg00132.html (18,947 bytes)

319. RE: [Karlnet] KN-50's - anyone seen this (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 11:28:33 -0500
Well, in our case its definitely not an IP address issue [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] case overlaps. to of sure will the fine. the -- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] ____
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-01/msg00133.html (14,987 bytes)

320. RE: [Karlnet] KN-50's - anyone seen this (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:26:02 -0500
Whats the ETA though? [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] the for 100%, I I another switching to KN-50's that's out for resume -- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _______________
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-01/msg00136.html (22,923 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu