Mail Archive Search: <+from:jna@tcpbbs.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:jna@tcpbbs.net: 80 ]

Total 80 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 16:24:59 -0500; if They are in bridge mode. Everything is in bridge mode, only exception is the kn-200 which is in router & bridge mode. Thats why I was saying I SHOULD be able to see it from my home link. Thanks,; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00161.html (9,172 bytes)
42. Re: [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 19:22:19 -0500; No this did not work. I plugged right into the RG's Ethernet port via a crossover cable, this is the RG connected to one of the radios in the kn-200. Yes it is in bridge mode and it does not pass the; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00163.html (9,933 bytes)
43. Re: [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 19:46:35 -0500; Yes they are all in the same subnet. John the routed _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00164.html (11,029 bytes)
44. Re: [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 20:59:41 -0500; No, it does not show up in the configurator under list of scanned devices. It does however show in the ip arp table of the rg1000's connected to its radio interfaces that are in bridging mode. I can; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00166.html (12,528 bytes)
45. Re: [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 21:43:10 -0500; Here is a visual, this should make things more clear :) http://www.tcpbbs.net/layout.html John [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] the ideas? and is SHOULD ________________________________________; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00167.html (12,112 bytes)
46. Re: [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 04:35:51 -0500; We are powering it via poe the run is only about 20'. from a tank house on top of a 15 story building. The unit was working just fine radios and all we are not even using the Ethernet on it, the only; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00170.html (15,402 bytes)
47. Re: [Karlnet]KARLNETRESPONSE_ReductionofKarlnetfeaturesw/outnotification. (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 21:08:32 -0500; It is kind of hidden away. You have to look in access control list then mac radius and in the lower right hand corner you will see a button called WARP settings. John ________________________________; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00210.html (14,573 bytes)
48. Re: [Karlnet] 100 mw card (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 03:08:46 -0500; Does the SMC cards have external connectors on them? John to find a good source for the 100mw as well _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http:/; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00241.html (8,277 bytes)
49. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 SNMP/ Net Management Server (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 03:44:03 -0500; Do you have a sample config file you could pass on for examination? Monitoring these things would be great. Thanks, John _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@W; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00244.html (36,892 bytes)
50. [Karlnet] Transfer Rates (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 21:43:07 -0500; Hello Group, I am trying to diagnose bad transfer rates in my network and started at square 1. We have an RG1000 SAT shooting a 3MB/S feed to a central relay tower only about 1 mile from the datacent; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00319.html (10,796 bytes)
51. Re: [Karlnet] Transfer Rates (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 00:38:14 -0500; That is whith a KN-200! No idea, I was told that the ping fill results show a round trip results. And that what ever I got in the ping fill will only show transfer half of the results in one directio; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00326.html (13,673 bytes)
52. Re: [Karlnet] Transfer Rates (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 00:41:02 -0500; Ours is all bridge up and untill it hits the router. John at central it. my here? to _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.wispnotes.; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00327.html (17,003 bytes)
53. Re: [Karlnet] Transfer Rates (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 00:40:23 -0500; The whole idea was to stay a karlnet network and as far as I know 2.4 is the only thing you can use karlnet with? Even so we went cross polarization. So our backhauls are 2.4 on horizontal and our PT; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00328.html (16,316 bytes)
54. Re: [Karlnet] Transfer Rates (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 02:40:59 -0500; I have considered that as an option as well,mikrotik, but if it is possible I wanted to keep it all Karlnet based because of the way we are setup. See we have our data feed coming from a data center; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00336.html (27,335 bytes)
55. Re: [Karlnet] Transfer Rates (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 22:15:38 -0500; Yes SOMETHING is wrong and that is what I am trying to figure out. But I did start at the beginning. All towers (will be) connected to the central relay point the KN-200. This gets its feed to the n; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00341.html (10,235 bytes)
56. Re: [Karlnet] Transfer Rates (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 22:38:55 -0500; Yes we have a 3MB feed into the switch at the data center, the RG Sat is plugged into that switch and sending it over to the central relay. The test is done from my win98 laptop at the ethernet of t; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00344.html (10,491 bytes)
57. Re: [Karlnet] Transfer Rates (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 22:41:40 -0500; I think this might be the key!? But would like to know for sure before I replace all my RG backhauls. John _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00345.html (8,976 bytes)
58. Re: [Karlnet] Transfer Rates (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 22:48:28 -0500; No my home link is an RG as well and is not experiencing the problem, its actually doing more than it should if we believe the ping fill. It is the central relay that is not getting the bandwidth bei; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00347.html (12,349 bytes)
59. Re: [Karlnet] Transfer Rates (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 16:00:33 -0500; Adjusting that with DrTCP the day I got my laptop, lol. I am using places like bandwidth.com bandwidthplace.com and as a last resort dslreports.com (Not to accurate under heavy load). Thats on my lap; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00352.html (10,052 bytes)
60. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1): Author: <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:29:33 -0500; Amen to that. I would really love to see a karlnet compatible radio that's boast more than a 5 mbs transfer capability. I have looked at alternatives like Mikrotick and such but really want to keep m; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00390.html (11,297 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]