Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:lists@applegatebroadband.net: 219 ]

Total 219 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [Karlnet] Fwd: Power Drain (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:18:49 -0800
Michael, We have a KN-200 on solar. I observe a power draw of .8A @12vdc, two 100mW PRISM 2.5 cards loaded with a small fan running off the fan header (chip cooler type, 1.5" dia.). Norm ____________
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-01/msg00052.html (8,639 bytes)

82. Re: [Karlnet] When are we going to see support for a/b/gAtheroscards? (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:47:09 -0800
Reg, really appreciate the in depth update! Norm -- Original Message -- From: "Support" <Support@karlnet.com> To: "Brett Hays" <bretth@htonline.net>; "Karlnet Mailing List" <karlnet@WISPNotes.com> Se
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-01/msg00060.html (15,331 bytes)

83. Re: [Karlnet] Compact Flash SW Availability, Compatability withSoekris hardware (incl. new net4526) (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:43:05 -0800
Brad, I'd also look at the PC Engines WRAP boards that are just coming out. http://www.pcengines.ch/pic/wrap.jpg Does anyone (Karnet included) have any idea as to the compatability of the Compact Fla
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-01/msg00076.html (11,341 bytes)

84. Re: [Karlnet] News! (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:51:32 -0800
Good luck in your new venture, Kevin. Cheers, Norm _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-01/msg00090.html (12,435 bytes)

85. Re: [Karlnet] Radio Interference from SR-4200? (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 13:39:22 -0800
Andy, I'd definitely put the hardware in a grounded box. I'll bet your problems disappear... Norm Grettings All, I wonder if anybody has come across a similar problem: I have an SR-4200 that I am usi
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00008.html (11,291 bytes)

86. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:38:40 -0800
I have some v1.00-00-052215 KN-50's and I want to upgrade them to v.1.00-00.073017. Anyone know how this is done? Norm _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WIS
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00032.html (9,230 bytes)

87. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:17:09 -0800
Also curious as to when we'll see some support for a and g standards? I could really use an upgrade in the backhaul, and I'd just as soon stay with what I know. Norm _________________________________
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00033.html (10,303 bytes)

88. Re: [Karlnet] Ubicom woes (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 08:57:13 -0800
Hi Charles, hows that KN-50/19dB panel CPE coming? Norm to I to also the any _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.wispnotes.com/mail
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00060.html (10,820 bytes)

89. Re: [Karlnet] Ubicom woes (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:18:42 -0800
Charles, the version that you are offering for $285 quantity one, is composed of what? KN-50, or KN-100? 19 dB panel/enclosure, w/ PoE, injector and a...24 vdc supply? Thanks, Norm __________________
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00069.html (14,695 bytes)

90. [Karlnet] FTP issue with v4.44 (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 16:32:15 -0800
I think I may have uncovered a problem with v4.44-00-103012. I loaded it on a KN-200 with two PRISM 2.5 100mW cards about a month ago, and started to get reports that FTP wouldn't work only for clien
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00075.html (8,639 bytes)

91. Re: [Karlnet] Heat Problems Continued - PoE solution for problems (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 08:56:29 -0800
Are the KN-200s that are shipping now have temperature control on the fan header? (I've got a KN-200 with a fan on it now, and to tell the truth, the fan doesn't use much power...and haven't had any
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00094.html (14,993 bytes)

92. Re: [Karlnet] license upgrade needed? (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 09:23:03 -0800
And you and the staff have a Happy New Year. Norm _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00165.html (13,760 bytes)

93. [Karlnet] Difference between what ping fill reports and actual TCP throughput (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 19:10:20 -0800
I recently tested a PtP shot we have using KN, and ping fill reported an average thoughput of 3.88Mbps. Testing it using a the bandwidth tester provided with the Mikrotik router on one end shows that
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00075.html (9,213 bytes)

94. Re: [Karlnet] RE: Reduction of Karlnet features w/out notification. (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 20:24:33 -0800
Why don't you try the BWR-1000's from MapleNet? They work very well, have a external N-male connector, and are based on the KN-50 (which so far I'm pretty happy with). Norm __________________________
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00208.html (10,942 bytes)

95. Re: [Karlnet] KARLNET RESPONSE_ Reduction of Karlnetfeaturesw/outnotification. (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 08:22:37 -0800
I'd really like to see NAT/DHCP on the KN-50. We've been insisting on customer's purchase of a router and that we manage it. However, it's a slow slide into the hell of managing the customer's intern
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00291.html (25,568 bytes)

96. Re: [Karlnet] KN50 Problem with 8.x firmware (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 14:48:44 -0800
Amen brother(s). Same problem noted here. It really limits where I can use the KN-50 CPEs. Norm _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00362.html (16,804 bytes)

97. Re: [Karlnet] KN50 Problem with 8.x firmware (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 09:58:40 -0800
I've also seen this problem quite often, reboot on access of webpage from wireless side. Norm _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.w
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00384.html (10,156 bytes)

98. Re: [Karlnet] Low Cost "802.11g" Wireless Link Equipment (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 07:48:17 -0800
Check out station-server.com. StarOS has just implemented support for the Atheros a,b,g card. I'm told it works pretty well. Norm _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00409.html (11,246 bytes)

99. Re: [Karlnet] KN50 packet loss bug (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 19:59:18 -0800
Bob, we see packet loss, but on the order of 1% or less. Still not good. can't _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.wispnotes.com/ma
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-01/msg00117.html (13,208 bytes)

100. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50's - anyone seen this (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 20:06:36 -0800
Brett, I noticed that overall latency in our network jumped from <10mS stable to in the 20-30mS average, some in the 100s mS unstable range as we added KN-50s to the mix it seems. I'm not sure what h
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-01/msg00118.html (9,865 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu