- 1. [Karlnet] Which F/W? (score: 1)
- Author: Noyan Dede <noyan@onur.net>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 10:26:10 +0300
- Hi guys, This is my first message to the list. We are a wireless equipment provider in Turkey. For one of our customers we've installed a base station and 5 satellites for internet service distributi
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00055.html (9,720 bytes)
- 2. RE: [Karlnet] compact flash (score: 1)
- Author: "Noyan DEDE" <noyan@onur.net>
- Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 11:16:17 +0300
- I've been using CF based Karlnet systems for around 2 years now with Soekris boards. Besides from that fact that resetting to factory default values is not available when using CF, we've never had an
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-09/msg00058.html (8,312 bytes)
- 3. RE: [Karlnet] compact flash (score: 1)
- Author: "Noyan DEDE" <noyan@onur.net>
- Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 13:30:45 +0300
- Banda, I don't see why it should work on standard PCs. The binary I use support 3 interfaces (2 eth, 1 wireless). But when using another Soekris board (2 eth, 2 wireless) I am not sure it will recogn
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-09/msg00060.html (8,345 bytes)
- 4. RE: [Karlnet] Attention to the Karlnet Big Wigs (score: 1)
- Author: "Noyan DEDE" <noyan@onur.net>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:49:33 +0200
- Gary, We have more equipment running KN software on Soekris boards than KN10x/20x hardware. The Soekris platform is much more reliable in terms of temperature issues in weatherproof enclosures. Compa
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-11/msg00032.html (14,262 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu