Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+AP\-1000\,\s+200mw\s+X\s+2\,\s+TurboCell\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+AP\-1000\,\s+200mw\s+X\s+2\,\s+TurboCell\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Karlnet] AP-1000, 200mw X 2, TurboCell (score: 1): Author: "Bill Fisher" <fisher@akorn.net>; Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 11:15:12 -0400; The AP-1000 with two 200mw cards in it seems to be running fine after almost 24 hours in the hot-box. I've rebooted it many times over with no ill-effects. Frankly, these cards don't seem much hotter; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-05/msg00110.html (7,321 bytes)
2. RE: [Karlnet] AP-1000, 200mw X 2, TurboCell (score: 1): Author: "Wireless Guy" <wirelessguy@natronics.net>; Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 11:46:06 -0500; What are you measuring your results with? Im just curious. I have just been using the Wireless link test in the configurator and it makes a huge difference on our links. But from what Tony says the c; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-05/msg00111.html (8,160 bytes)
3. RE: [Karlnet] AP-1000, 200mw X 2, TurboCell (score: 1): Author: "Bill Fisher" <fisher@akorn.net>; Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 15:46:01 -0400; Hi Nate. I'm going to use the link test. I don't know of another way to measure receive signal strength using these cards. Bill; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-05/msg00115.html (7,529 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]