- 1. [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1)
- Author: "Marcelo Gimenez" <marcelo@aeronetworks.com.br>
- Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 18:10:21 -0300
- Hi, Please, how can i configure KN-50 to works in 802.11 ( no Turbocell)? Thanks, Marcelo Gimenez AERO NETWORKS LTDA (+55 67) 326-9494 / 8111-8006 http://www.aeronetworks.com.br _____________________
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00031.html (8,258 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1)
- Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
- Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:38:40 -0800
- I have some v1.00-00-052215 KN-50's and I want to upgrade them to v.1.00-00.073017. Anyone know how this is done? Norm _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WIS
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00032.html (9,230 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1)
- Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
- Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:17:09 -0800
- Also curious as to when we'll see some support for a and g standards? I could really use an upgrade in the backhaul, and I'd just as soon stay with what I know. Norm _________________________________
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00033.html (10,303 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1)
- Author: <jna@tcpbbs.net>
- Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:29:33 -0500
- Amen to that. I would really love to see a karlnet compatible radio that's boast more than a 5 mbs transfer capability. I have looked at alternatives like Mikrotick and such but really want to keep m
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00034.html (11,300 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1)
- Author: "Brett Hays" <bretth@htonline.net>
- Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:39:40 -0500
- Amen to that!! just I Turbocell)? _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00035.html (12,457 bytes)
- 6. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1)
- Author: Michael McDermott <michael@veritech.com.au>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:54:26 +1100
- What did you think about the Mikrotick g backhaul soultion? At 08:39 PM 10/12/2003 -0500, you wrote: Amen to that!! -- Original Message -- From: <jna@tcpbbs.net> To: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroa
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00036.html (12,849 bytes)
- 7. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1)
- Author: <jna@tcpbbs.net>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 00:05:21 -0500
- I have considered it and am really going to try and keep all Karlnet. I know the 802 will be outgrown faster than I would like. I just need to get more bandwidth to my backhauls. that's alternatives
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00037.html (14,526 bytes)
- 8. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1)
- Author: "Brett Hays" <bretth@htonline.net>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 00:24:37 -0500
- We are keeping Karlnet for ap's and going to Trango for backhaul...I would really rather have all Karlnet, though. know network backhaul. to _______________________________________________ Karlnet ma
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00038.html (16,028 bytes)
- 9. RE: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1)
- Author: "wbos" <wbos@lumiad.nl>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 18:15:55 +0100
- Before everybody jumps to this. We have a network in the Netherlands and implemented a g backhaul + an a backhaul solutions. We have set up 5 5ghz links now and really got frustrated on this frequenc
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00046.html (16,503 bytes)
- 10. RE: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1)
- Author: "Caleb Carroll" <karlnet@pathcom.ca>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:41:30 -0700
- Wim, Welcome to the wonderful world of unlicensed spectrum! ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.wispnotes.com
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00048.html (11,898 bytes)
- 11. [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1)
- Author: "Marcelo Gimenez" <marcelo@aeronetworks.com.br>
- Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 18:10:21 -0300
- Hi, Please, how can i configure KN-50 to works in 802.11 ( no Turbocell)? Thanks, Marcelo Gimenez AERO NETWORKS LTDA (+55 67) 326-9494 / 8111-8006 http://www.aeronetworks.com.br _____________________
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00386.html (8,258 bytes)
- 12. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1)
- Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
- Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:17:09 -0800
- Also curious as to when we'll see some support for a and g standards? I could really use an upgrade in the backhaul, and I'd just as soon stay with what I know. Norm _________________________________
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00388.html (10,323 bytes)
- 13. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1)
- Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
- Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:38:40 -0800
- I have some v1.00-00-052215 KN-50's and I want to upgrade them to v.1.00-00.073017. Anyone know how this is done? Norm _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WIS
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00389.html (9,222 bytes)
- 14. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1)
- Author: <jna@tcpbbs.net>
- Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:29:33 -0500
- Amen to that. I would really love to see a karlnet compatible radio that's boast more than a 5 mbs transfer capability. I have looked at alternatives like Mikrotick and such but really want to keep m
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00390.html (11,297 bytes)
- 15. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1)
- Author: "Brett Hays" <bretth@htonline.net>
- Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:39:40 -0500
- Amen to that!! just I Turbocell)? _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00391.html (12,452 bytes)
- 16. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1)
- Author: Michael McDermott <michael@veritech.com.au>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:54:26 +1100
- What did you think about the Mikrotick g backhaul soultion? At 08:39 PM 10/12/2003 -0500, you wrote: Amen to that!! -- Original Message -- From: <jna@tcpbbs.net> To: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroa
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00392.html (12,849 bytes)
- 17. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1)
- Author: <jna@tcpbbs.net>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 00:05:21 -0500
- I have considered it and am really going to try and keep all Karlnet. I know the 802 will be outgrown faster than I would like. I just need to get more bandwidth to my backhauls. that's alternatives
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00393.html (14,526 bytes)
- 18. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1)
- Author: "Brett Hays" <bretth@htonline.net>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 00:24:37 -0500
- We are keeping Karlnet for ap's and going to Trango for backhaul...I would really rather have all Karlnet, though. know network backhaul. to _______________________________________________ Karlnet ma
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00394.html (16,034 bytes)
- 19. RE: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1)
- Author: "wbos" <wbos@lumiad.nl>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 18:15:55 +0100
- Before everybody jumps to this. We have a network in the Netherlands and implemented a g backhaul + an a backhaul solutions. We have set up 5 5ghz links now and really got frustrated on this frequenc
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00403.html (16,513 bytes)
- 20. RE: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1)
- Author: "Caleb Carroll" <karlnet@pathcom.ca>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:41:30 -0700
- Wim, Welcome to the wonderful world of unlicensed spectrum! ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.wispnotes.com
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00404.html (11,898 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu