- 1. Re: [Karlnet] SNMP on KN-50 (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 10:38:40 -0600
- maybe this is a stupid question but .....you had the hardware built to your specs.....right? Why not put enough rom on the board to handle today and the future? -bob -- Original Message -- From: "Kev
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00292.html (29,121 bytes)
- 2. RE: [Karlnet] SNMP on KN-50 (score: 1)
- Author: "smyers" <wifiengineer@telsouth.net>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 11:57:35 -0500
- As a user of the KN-50 instilled in the integrated 18db CPE, I have had little to no problems with the way it is designed. For us, it is a CPE: it is designed to get a customer on the network in such
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00293.html (27,782 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Karlnet] SNMP on KN-50 (score: 1)
- Author: "Brett Hays" <bretth@htonline.net>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 12:05:25 -0500
- I agree in terms of dhcp and nat on the KN50. I just wish it could support snmp so we could use Configurator across the board to manage the network. _______________________________________________ Ka
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00294.html (31,195 bytes)
- 4. [Karlnet] SNMP on KN-50 (score: 1)
- Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 11:28:22 -0600
- All, Since there has been much discussion on the lists I did some checking with the engineers. Bottom line: it is VERY doubtful that we can add SNMP support to the KN-50. There is simply not enough r
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00295.html (26,343 bytes)
- 5. RE: [Karlnet] SNMP on KN-50 (score: 1)
- Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:10:55 -0600
- NOT a stupid question! Yes the board is our design. The problem is in the UBICOM chip! Although single chip solutions are a blessing in that they reduce costs, they aslo are limited in how much memor
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00296.html (30,117 bytes)
- 6. Re: [Karlnet] SNMP on KN-50 (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 10:38:40 -0600
- maybe this is a stupid question but .....you had the hardware built to your specs.....right? Why not put enough rom on the board to handle today and the future? -bob -- Original Message -- From: "Kev
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00222.html (29,176 bytes)
- 7. RE: [Karlnet] SNMP on KN-50 (score: 1)
- Author: "smyers" <wifiengineer@telsouth.net>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 11:57:35 -0500
- As a user of the KN-50 instilled in the integrated 18db CPE, I have had little to no problems with the way it is designed. For us, it is a CPE: it is designed to get a customer on the network in such
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00223.html (27,782 bytes)
- 8. Re: [Karlnet] SNMP on KN-50 (score: 1)
- Author: "Brett Hays" <bretth@htonline.net>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 12:05:25 -0500
- I agree in terms of dhcp and nat on the KN50. I just wish it could support snmp so we could use Configurator across the board to manage the network. _______________________________________________ Ka
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00224.html (31,191 bytes)
- 9. [Karlnet] SNMP on KN-50 (score: 1)
- Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 11:28:22 -0600
- All, Since there has been much discussion on the lists I did some checking with the engineers. Bottom line: it is VERY doubtful that we can add SNMP support to the KN-50. There is simply not enough r
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00225.html (26,293 bytes)
- 10. RE: [Karlnet] SNMP on KN-50 (score: 1)
- Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:10:55 -0600
- NOT a stupid question! Yes the board is our design. The problem is in the UBICOM chip! Although single chip solutions are a blessing in that they reduce costs, they aslo are limited in how much memor
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00226.html (30,123 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu