Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+Strange\s+ping\s+loss\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+Strange\s+ping\s+loss\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Karlnet] Strange ping loss (score: 1): Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 08:43:36 -0500; I have an Orinoco COR v4.15 with about 14 RG-1000 clients and 1 AP-1000 that is serving as a POP and backhaul for the small pop. In all, about 35 clients are going through this AP, in on way or anoth; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00036.html (9,024 bytes)
2. Re: [Karlnet] Strange ping loss (score: 1): Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 08:24:55 -0700; Hi Bob, I think that I may be seeing the same thing. I noticed that sometime this summer as I added clients to our WIPOP the jitter from the clients to the AP/NOC really went bad (as previously menti; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00037.html (10,928 bytes)
3. Re: [Karlnet] Strange ping loss (score: 1): Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 10:29:16 -0500; many of my RG clients are using the new 4.41 fw. I wonder if that is the cause? Can I downgrade these? this on to is Satellite/Base. for errors constantly, times. I; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00038.html (12,211 bytes)
4. Re: [Karlnet] Strange ping loss (score: 1): Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 09:17:08 -0700; I'm sure you can. It may be that the problem showed up when I went to 4.43 on the base. I went the other way and upgraded all my clients to 4.43 while trying to fix this problem....no change. I haven; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00039.html (13,750 bytes)
5. RE: [Karlnet] Strange ping loss (score: 1): Author: "Steve Deaton" <steve@texasbb.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:20:35 -0500; For whatever it's worth, I just found a NAT problem. This will only apply if you're running NAT on the device that is locking up. Some clients behind the NAT AP were running something that was genera; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00040.html (12,391 bytes)
6. Re: [Karlnet] Strange ping loss (score: 1): Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:26:08 -0500; most of my AP's either route or are just dumb bridges. I don't think they are powerful enough to handle the NAT. -- Original Message -- From: "Steve Deaton" <steve@texasbb.com> To: "'Norm Young'" <np; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00041.html (14,195 bytes)
7. RE: [Karlnet] Strange ping loss (score: 1): Author: "Steve Deaton" <steve@texasbb.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 15:07:11 -0500; That is wise. None of ours NAT, but at an apartment complex we made an outdoor FlashROM as a satellite station (works great as far as the elements are concerned) and received a wireless backhaul whic; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00042.html (15,251 bytes)
8. Re: [Karlnet] Strange ping loss (score: 1): Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 22:11:21 -0500; I think I've checked most all of the CPE's I'm having problems with. They all have 4.43K installed. coincidence? 4.43 while the timeouts tried 35 minutes. The 10% many disabled; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00043.html (15,201 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]