Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jmaass@columbus.rr.com: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [Propagation] Critical vs. Maximum Usable Frequency map (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Maass" <jmaass@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 15:35:16 -0400
Tomas: How does the MUF map predict availablity of a DX path for 80 Meter QSOs (which was the original question), or for 160 Meters? Are there better tools available for realtime display of current c
/archives//html/Propagation/2004-09/msg00036.html (11,138 bytes)

2. RE: [Propagation] Critical vs. Maximum Usable Frequency map (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Maass" <jmaass@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 21:37:32 -0400
Dave: Here was the original question, which wasn't mine: So, in fact, Chas was asking about NVIS, and I'm sorry for jumping the gun. There are, however, plenty of DX signals (3000 kM and more) on 80
/archives//html/Propagation/2004-09/msg00042.html (11,764 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu