- 1. [Propagation] (no subject) (score: 1)
- Author: "KennyC " <wn2wnc@usadatanet.net>
- Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 16:07:13 -0300
- propagation-request@contesting.com _______________________________________________ Propagation mailing list Propagation@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/propagation
- /archives//html/Propagation/2004-08/msg00008.html (6,614 bytes)
- 2. [Propagation] (no subject) (score: 1)
- Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>
- Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 18:18:50 -0400
- Hi, This morning I was explaining the HFProp program to another ham over the phone. I noticed the program showed there were no propagation on 3.5 MHz, and he countered that he could hear all kinds of
- /archives//html/Propagation/2004-09/msg00029.html (6,628 bytes)
- 3. RE: [Propagation] (no subject) (score: 1)
- Author: "David Ackrill" <dave.g0dja@tiscali.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 06:09:16 -0000
- Possibly because most propagation prediction programs are predicting low angle 'DX' propagation? If you want the local F2 Critical frequency (the one where signals go almost straight up and down, try
- /archives//html/Propagation/2004-09/msg00033.html (8,037 bytes)
- 4. [Propagation] (no subject) (score: 1)
- Author: Norm Waltho <nwaltho@interbaun.com>
- Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 11:46:01 -0700
- unsubscribe -- ** Information contained in this communication may be confidential and is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above subject to solicitor client privilege. If the reader
- /archives//html/Propagation/2005-01/msg00001.html (8,008 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu