Mail Archive Search: <+from:Hare>

Results:

References: [ +from:Hare: 612 ]

Total 612 documents matching your query.

121. [RFI] 2 meter interference in my pho (score: 1): Author: Hare, Ed, W1RFI" <ehare@arrl.org (Hare, Ed, W1RFI); Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 11:25:00 -0500; Hello, Jack, VHF interference to wired telephones is not common, but it does happen. The use of indoor antennas does add to the problem. In general, you will need an RFI filter at each telephone or a; /archives//html/RFI/1998-01/msg00057.html (11,968 bytes)
122. RE: [RFI] BPL reply comments (score: 1): Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 10:04:08 -0400; Streetlights can be incidental or unintentional emitters. Incidental emitters don't deliberately generate RF energy, but just happen to do so as part of their operation. They have no specific radiate; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00148.html (14,163 bytes)
123. RE: [RFI] BPL reply comments (score: 1): Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 12:59:39 -0400; BPL is a carrier-current device. Some carrier-current devices, such as campus AM broadcast facilities, are intentional emitters. Those must meet the requirements for intentional emitters and avoid in; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00151.html (19,094 bytes)
124. [RFI] BPL NOI Comment and Reply Comment hyperlinks to filings (score: 1): Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 07:01:39 -0400; I had to put this together for in-house use, so felt it would be useful to share it with anyone who can make good use of it. Links to BPL NOI Comments and Reply Comments http://www.arrl.org/~ehare/bp; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00158.html (6,925 bytes)
125. RE: [RFI] Formal RFI complaint to the FCC (score: 1): Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 22:03:57 -0500; The TV won't be in the database. As an unintentional emitter and not a computer or computer peripheral, it is subject only to the verification requirements in Part 15. This means only that the manufa; /archives//html/RFI/2003-11/msg00010.html (13,444 bytes)
126. RE: [RFI] WWRB (score: 1): Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 22:07:05 -0500; The mix could be in the station equipment, other equipment or corrosion near either transmitter, or your own equipment or station. Much of the "intermod" associated with AM transmitters comes from yo; /archives//html/RFI/2003-11/msg00011.html (8,513 bytes)
127. RE: Topband: RE: [RFI] WWRB (score: 1): Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 10:00:30 -0500; Hi, Tom. I missed that it was you! Sorry about that. :-) 73, Ed Hare, W1RFI ARRL Lab 225 Main St Newington, CT 06111 Tel: 860-594-0318 Internet: w1rfi@arrl.org Web: http://www.arrl.org/tis __________; /archives//html/RFI/2003-11/msg00015.html (8,550 bytes)
128. RE: [RFI] Formal RFI complaint to the FCC (score: 1): Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 10:29:47 -0500; 73, Ed Hare, W1RFI ARRL Lab 225 Main St Newington, CT 06111 Tel: 860-594-0318 Internet: w1rfi@arrl.org Web: http://www.arrl.org/tis ARRL is the National Association for Amateur Radio. It is supporte; /archives//html/RFI/2003-11/msg00022.html (10,175 bytes)
129. RE: [RFI] Formal RFI complaint to the FCC (score: 1): Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 17:00:17 -0500; Well, it MAY be good news. So far, we haven't had a chance to confirm it one way or the other. I've been kinda' busy with BPL stuff. :-) Tom Frenaye told me today of a newer flat-screen technology th; /archives//html/RFI/2003-11/msg00025.html (10,259 bytes)
130. RE: [RFI] RE:[TowerTalk] electric fence qrn (score: 1): Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:09:32 -0500; What most hams report as problems is buzz........buzz, at the PRR. This is almost always caused by defects on the fence itself. Splices that are good enough for the fence to work can be RF noisy. Ga; /archives//html/RFI/2003-12/msg00035.html (8,898 bytes)
131. RE: [RFI] I wish this guy had interviewed Ed Hare also... (score: 1): Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:16:23 -0500; Actually, they did. I was quoted briefly in other versions of the same story. I and others have been sending lots of BPL-article links to the BPLandHamRadio@yahoogroups.com list. Those that are inter; /archives//html/RFI/2004-01/msg00023.html (10,003 bytes)
132. RE: [RFI] I wish this guy had interviewed Ed Hare also... (score: 1): Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:17:46 -0500; Homeplug has put ~30dB notches in the ham bands, except for 5.3 MHz. It is not adaptive. It may offer some protection to some amateur spectrum, but everybody eles's ox, including WWV, aeronautical, S; /archives//html/RFI/2004-01/msg00024.html (10,189 bytes)
133. RE: [RFI] I wish this guy had interviewed Ed Hare also... (score: 1): Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:18:46 -0500; The AMRAD filing documented interference to a HomePlug BPL system in Potomac, MD. 15 watts brought the system down. 73, Ed Hare, W1RFI ARRL Lab 225 Main St Newington, CT 06111 Tel: 860-594-0318 Inter; /archives//html/RFI/2004-01/msg00025.html (11,941 bytes)
134. RE: [RFI] I wish this guy had interviewed Ed Hare also... (score: 1): Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:43:25 -0500; If I recall, it was 15 watts to a mobile antenna parked on the curb outside the house (~12 meters from the house; I have been there myself). 100 watts parked on the curb 1/2 mile away had the same ef; /archives//html/RFI/2004-01/msg00028.html (14,119 bytes)
135. [RFI] EMC active loop antennas (score: 1): Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:02:44 -0500; Do any of you have experience with any particular active HF loop antennas calibrated for EMC measurements? If so, if you have any recommendations for an economical choice, please let me know on this; /archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00060.html (6,954 bytes)
136. RE: [RFI] EMC active loop antennas (score: 1): Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 10:28:36 -0500; The FCC's assumption of free-space conditions is based on standard methodology. The methods in ANSI C63.4 are similar to those in CISPR-22, etc. Although the FCC rules are expressed in terms of elec; /archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00065.html (12,806 bytes)
137. RE: [RFI] Your Bandpass Filters (score: 1): Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:39:21 -0500; I found the following doing a web search on "Dunestar filter": http://www.k6xx.com/radio/dunestar/ds504.html http://www.k6xx.com/radio/dunestar/ds600.html There were others that appeared in the searc; /archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00117.html (9,188 bytes)
138. RE: [RFI] BPL posts (score: 1): Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:14:58 -0500; The BPLandHamRadio@yahoogroups.com list has been pretty active. Ed Hare, W1RFI ARRL Lab 225 Main St Newington, CT 06111 Tel: 860-594-0318 Internet: w1rfi@arrl.org Web: http://www.arrl.org/tis Member:; /archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00143.html (9,828 bytes)
139. RE: [RFI] re bpl qrm (score: 1): Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 17:22:15 -0500; http://www.arrl.org/~ehare/hyperlinks.html#reports Ed Hare, W1RFI ARRL Lab 225 Main St Newington, CT 06111 Tel: 860-594-0318 Internet: w1rfi@arrl.org Web: http://www.arrl.org/tis Member: IEEE C63 -; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00016.html (9,125 bytes)
140. RE: [RFI] re bpl qrm (score: 1): Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 20:38:10 -0500; As Homer would say, "Doh!" The correct link is http://www.arrl.org/~ehare/bpl/hyperlinks.html#reports <http://www.arrl.org/~ehare/bpl/hyperlinks.html#reports> Sorry about that, folks! 73, Ed, W1RFI -; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00019.html (10,915 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]