Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Hare: 599 ]

Total 599 documents matching your query.

261. Re: [RFI] LED lighting (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 19:20:12 +0000
Your wish is my command. :-) http://www.arrl.org/news/arrl-files-more-grow-light-ballast-complaints-with-fcc God Love you people!!!!! Please publicize this on your web site! It helps bring the issue
/archives//html/RFI/2015-07/msg00104.html (12,121 bytes)

262. [RFI] ARRL Board of Directors resolution related to FCC enforcement of radio-interference issues (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 16:55:59 +0000
This is from the minutes of the July 2015 meeting of the ARRL Board of Directors: 39. On motion of Mr. Frenaye, seconded by Mr. Isely, the following resolution was ADOPTED: Whereas, there exist unacc
/archives//html/RFI/2015-07/msg00111.html (8,846 bytes)

263. Re: [RFI] ARRL Board of Directors resolution related to FCCenforcement of radio-interference issues (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 19:47:34 +0000
Actually, that's not really intended to be an easy out. If we want FCC enforcement to have teeth, the old paradigm will not work. We can't expect to identify a thousand RFI problems, turn them all ov
/archives//html/RFI/2015-07/msg00152.html (11,234 bytes)

264. Re: [RFI] ARRL Board of Directors resolution related to FCC enforcement of radio-interference issues (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 19:52:25 +0000
I'd suggest that hams send an email to their directors, letting them know how they feel about the resolution. I personally am glad, as a ham and as HQ staff, and pleased that MY director made the mot
/archives//html/RFI/2015-07/msg00153.html (13,328 bytes)

265. Re: [RFI] ARRL Board of Directors resolution related to FCC enforcement of radio-interference issues (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2015 14:17:38 +0000
The FCC can and does have teeth any time it chooses. It has issued fines again and again in support of whatever agenda exists What partisan politics reason would the FCC have for not taking action on
/archives//html/RFI/2015-08/msg00015.html (10,385 bytes)

266. Re: [RFI] ARRL Board of Directors resolution related to FCC enforcement of radio-interference issues (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 18:50:39 +0000
Surprisingly, the answer to that question is often "yes." Here are just a few examples: Years back, a company called Phonex made wireless modem jacks that operated on 3.53 MHz. They were carrier-cur
/archives//html/RFI/2015-08/msg00025.html (14,529 bytes)

267. Re: [RFI] ARRL Board of Directors resolution related to FCC enforcement of radio-interference issues (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 11:27:18 +0000
I don't think that we will ever know the percentage of fines collected, Jim, but for most of the people involved, the fining process probably involves lawyers and a major hassle, and that alone may b
/archives//html/RFI/2015-08/msg00034.html (12,146 bytes)

268. Re: [RFI] ARRL Board of Directors resolution related to FCC enforcement of radio-interference issues (Hare, Ed W1RFI) (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 19:10:49 +0000
Yes, and of all the people and groups that are wise about these RFI matters, ARRL has been the only group that is consistently active year after year. Broadcasters and radio astronomers are notably a
/archives//html/RFI/2015-08/msg00035.html (11,520 bytes)

269. Re: [RFI] Laser Christmas Lights (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 19:59:59 +0000
I happened to see this email, so I am going to get one of these from Lowe's and make some measurements of it. ARRL does have the capability of making measurements of noise levels, to see if these dev
/archives//html/RFI/2015-11/msg00020.html (8,362 bytes)

270. Re: [RFI] Laser Christmas Lights (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 16:28:47 +0000
I went to my local Lowes and didn't find one. Does anyone have a model number? Was it really at Lowes, or maybe some other store? Ed, W1RFI Greg, suggest getting the product manufacturer and model no
/archives//html/RFI/2015-12/msg00025.html (8,971 bytes)

271. Re: [RFI] Laser Christmas Lights (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 15:18:16 +0000
Thanks. I am going to take a trip there next week and buy one to test. I'd really like to know whether these meet the FCC limits or not. Interference reports give me a good excuse to do that. :-) ___
/archives//html/RFI/2015-12/msg00042.html (11,685 bytes)

272. Re: [RFI] Laser Christmas Lights (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 12:14:22 +0000
That's not exactly accurate, Dave. I am a QRPer, so we connect them in series with my HW8 and the resultant non-linearities allow me to achieve QRP Worked All States simultaneously on all harmonicall
/archives//html/RFI/2015-12/msg00050.html (11,829 bytes)

273. Re: [RFI] Laser Christmas Lights (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 12:17:10 +0000
What is typically done is that ARRL files a complaint with the FCC. Unfortunately, the FCC then takes the position that is will not comment on active complaint cases, and in too many cases, it is not
/archives//html/RFI/2015-12/msg00051.html (10,516 bytes)

274. Re: [RFI] New Kenmore Elite 72483 is RF-Quiet (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 15:56:47 +0000
This is one of the rare cases where a ham tell us that a particular device has no interference. :-) One down, 10 million models of electronics stuff to go. Ed We just installed our new Kenmore Eleite
/archives//html/RFI/2015-12/msg00055.html (8,613 bytes)

275. Re: [RFI] Blower noise from Carrier Furnace (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 19:34:29 +0000
It may have been said already, but all pulse-width-controlled motors used in furnaces are compliant with the FCC rules if they have even a modest amount of filtering. A furnace is an appliance, as de
/archives//html/RFI/2016-01/msg00091.html (14,450 bytes)

276. Re: [RFI] Blower noise from Carrier Furnace (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 21:04:46 +0000
Yes, I think that is known, but it never hurts to make that clear. So, if my home furnace interferes with my ham station, does my wife get the fine? She and I are both operators of the offending devi
/archives//html/RFI/2016-01/msg00096.html (17,008 bytes)

277. Re: [RFI] Galaxy Grow Light Ballast Update (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 17:08:26 +0000
I have seen filters for both the load and lamp side, so you may need to try both. I had thought it was on the Hydrofarm site, but I don't see the load and lamp filters listed. I think I ordered some,
/archives//html/RFI/2016-02/msg00005.html (15,612 bytes)

278. Re: [RFI] Galaxy Grow Light Ballast Update (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 21:48:26 +0000
A GFCI will protect against a shock that would result from the hot wire conducting current to the ground conductor or external ground, but it will not protect against a shock from the hot to the neut
/archives//html/RFI/2016-02/msg00018.html (9,908 bytes)

279. Re: [RFI] cops zero in on noisy grow light ballasts (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 17:17:29 +0000
Actually, the formal name of ARRL now is ARRL, with American Radio Relay League still maintained, of course. Now, as to the noisy grow lights, in some areas, growers are concerned that law enforcemen
/archives//html/RFI/2016-02/msg00022.html (10,564 bytes)

280. Re: [RFI] Finding house noise sources (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 18:18:10 +0000
In theory, there should not be any hidden junction boxes behind drywall, but as I have seen on Holmes on Homes, that's not always the case. :-) I think I'd be inclinded to use the noise itself as my
/archives//html/RFI/2016-02/msg00024.html (8,066 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu