Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ingraham.ma.ultranet@rcn.com: 94 ]

Total 94 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [RFI] The new light bulbs (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ingraham.ma.ultranet@rcn.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:14:42 -0500
IMO, very good write-up, Dale (WA9ENA). One of the side-effects of the restrictions on certain types/wattages of incandescents, I fear, is that they will be / have been forced out of the incandescent
/archives//html/RFI/2011-03/msg00031.html (7,818 bytes)

82. Re: [RFI] RFI from Electrolux Front Loading Dryer (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ingraham.ma.ultranet@rcn.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:03:59 -0400
I agree with Jim Brown, the case should already be grounded by way of the power cord. I am hoping yours is. Agreed, it may not be an effective RF ground at VHF, but it is there anyway and serves a pu
/archives//html/RFI/2011-03/msg00070.html (8,377 bytes)

83. Re: [RFI] More on LightSquared (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ingraham.ma.ultranet@rcn.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:22:08 -0400
I haven't followed this closely ... but is it much different than cellphone antennas mounted on the sides or roof of an apartment or office building? Given enough demand for bandwidth that people wi
/archives//html/RFI/2011-03/msg00086.html (7,863 bytes)

84. Re: [RFI] Didn't mobile phones originate in Ham radio? (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ingraham.ma.ultranet@rcn.com>
Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 23:06:00 -0400
When did astronomers start looking for black holes? I'm no expert (I'm an engineer, not a scientist), but I don't recall anyone talking about trying to look for black hole evidence until the last dec
/archives//html/RFI/2011-05/msg00087.html (7,430 bytes)

85. [RFI] CFL list, anywhere? (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ingraham.ma.ultranet@rcn.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 13:29:29 -0500
Howdy, all, Does anyone know of a good email list or forum concerning the subject of CFLs (compact fluorescents)? I know, why would someone want to use them, right? Actually, though, I am one of thos
/archives//html/RFI/2011-12/msg00009.html (7,028 bytes)

86. Re: [RFI] CFL list, anywhere? (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ingraham.ma.ultranet@rcn.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 17:19:20 -0500
I don't want a list to discuss RFI from CFLs. I want a list that talks about all the non-RFI issues of CFLs. Are you saying it is OK to turn this list over to talk about CFLs that has nothing to do
/archives//html/RFI/2011-12/msg00013.html (7,406 bytes)

87. Re: [RFI] CFL list, anywhere? (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ingraham.ma.ultranet@rcn.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 18:07:20 -0500
That's what I used to believe. But many reports in the last several years say that it hasn't been true for a long time. (I think Mythbusters covered that too.) Turn them off even if it's only for a f
/archives//html/RFI/2011-12/msg00014.html (10,350 bytes)

88. Re: [RFI] CFL list, anywhere? (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ingraham.ma.ultranet@rcn.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 18:37:23 -0500
But none of it (so far) is about email reflectors and compact fluorescents. Lots of stuff about lamp reflectors, for reflecting light. Lots of stuff about Central Florida. Or the Canadian Football L
/archives//html/RFI/2011-12/msg00015.html (7,612 bytes)

89. Re: [RFI] Original message and replying (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ingraham.ma.ultranet@rcn.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:38:45 -0500
I never heard of that proclamation! As far as this reader is concerned, it is definitely not preferred. While I haven't read it top-to-bottom yet, I don't see anything standing out that says top-post
/archives//html/RFI/2012-01/msg00093.html (10,237 bytes)

90. Re: [RFI] Original message and replying (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ingraham.ma.ultranet@rcn.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:12:03 -0500
Does an iPhone or other mobile device make it impossible to trim your posts? Hmm, that will be a really bad thing for posting etiquette, if true. (As it appears to be, since you weren't able to trim
/archives//html/RFI/2012-01/msg00098.html (9,579 bytes)

91. Re: [RFI] Original message and replying (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ingraham.ma.ultranet@rcn.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 23:21:55 -0500
That's fair enough. You are entitled to that. :-) But it was a serious question. I don't email from mobile devices, and I seriously wondered whether mobile devices make it impossible to trim posts.
/archives//html/RFI/2012-01/msg00101.html (10,176 bytes)

92. Re: [RFI] 2nd try - URL for the W8WWV RFI writeup (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ingraham.ma.ultranet@rcn.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 12:11:56 -0400
Truncation and word wrapping is mainly a function of the SENDER's email program, not the particular mail reflector (although the mail reflector might strip out HTML portions of a message, which might
/archives//html/RFI/2012-04/msg00006.html (8,523 bytes)

93. Re: [RFI] Is a low pass filter necessary? (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ingraham.ma.ultranet@rcn.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 08:45:46 -0400
I thought the ordinary HF low-pass filters were and still are designed for up to HF only, so they don't pass 6 meters which is VHF. I wouldn't expect that to change unless the filter specifically st
/archives//html/RFI/2012-05/msg00022.html (8,399 bytes)

94. Re: [RFI] 6 Minutes - a record? (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ingraham.ma.ultranet@rcn.com>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 08:45:51 -0400
If this is a charger/desulfator, then it remains doing its stuff (banging the battery at a few MHz to get the sulfate deposits off the plates of the battery) even with no AC power. Andy ____________
/archives//html/RFI/2012-05/msg00031.html (6,886 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 94
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
This search system is powered by Namazu