Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ka5s@earthlink.net: 420 ]

Total 420 documents matching your query.

181. Re: [RFI] Haolgens AND . . . (score: 1)
Author: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 23:11:31 -0500
The problem is not halogen bulbs, but the switching power supplies now used instead of low voltage transformers. Lamp dimmers too are prolific interference sources. As for energy-saving screw-in fluo
/archives//html/RFI/2006-11/msg00050.html (7,575 bytes)

182. Re: [RFI] Loop H vs E Field (was "wireless power at 6.4 MHz?") (score: 1)
Author: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:47:57 -0500
The magnetic loop matter comes up every few years. FWIW, I get useful E-field loop "shielding" by simply shorting the local E-field with grounded wire next to one. Make it a tube and you have the shi
/archives//html/RFI/2006-11/msg00065.html (6,799 bytes)

183. Re: [RFI] Identification help (score: 1)
Author: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 07:02:09 -0500
Lucklily, the November Monitoring Times Digital Digest column is titled "What's That Sound?" and includes just what we need. Check out the link they provide to Leif Dehio, who has "...recorded and cl
/archives//html/RFI/2006-11/msg00090.html (8,092 bytes)

184. Re: [RFI] Low voltage lighting solid state "transformers" (long) (score: 1)
Author: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 20:47:07 -0500
Power supplies face no FCC Part 15 radiated RF tests below 30 MHz. There IS a conducted emissions test. QUOTE Section 15.107 Conducted limits. (a) Except for Class A digital devices, for equipment th
/archives//html/RFI/2006-12/msg00044.html (13,701 bytes)

185. Re: [RFI] Low voltage lighting solid state "transformers" (long) (score: 1)
Author: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 20:00:38 -0500
I see from the UL site they are made by PILOT INTERNATIONAL LTD E185630 ROOM 1708-09, 17/FL TOWER A, REGENT CENTRE 63 WO YI HOP RD KWAI CHUNG, NT HONG KONG and they have a valid UL listing (http://ti
/archives//html/RFI/2006-12/msg00046.html (8,745 bytes)

186. Re: [RFI] Low voltage lighting solid state "transformers" (long) (score: 1)
Author: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:23:37 -0500
I spent some (don't look now, boss) using the high-speed system at work looking on the FCC Web site for form 740's (required to import RF-producing items) indicating verification was performed. I did
/archives//html/RFI/2006-12/msg00050.html (9,714 bytes)

187. Re: [RFI] Low voltage lighting solid state "transformers" (long,somewhat OT) (score: 1)
Author: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 03:21:50 -0500
An acute observation, and thanks, too for diving into the UL site. "Factory assembled", eh? The thot plickens! Cortland KA5S (long,somewhat OT) a <http://www.hrelampparts.com/files/Cat/HRE/Ballast_Tr
/archives//html/RFI/2006-12/msg00061.html (11,604 bytes)

188. Re: [RFI] Low voltage lighting solid state "transformers" (long,somewhat OT) (score: 1)
Author: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 19:19:58 -0500
Well. as already noted, for small items you may not get a label. It is possible to have Part 15 information an instruction sheet, for example. I will add also that for Verification, there wil be no F
/archives//html/RFI/2006-12/msg00064.html (10,264 bytes)

189. Re: [RFI] DSL INTERFERENCE FROM 160 METERS (score: 1)
Author: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 21:57:04 -0500
Probably the nature of the beast. ADSL uses spectrum up to 1.1 MHz and ADSL2 up to 2.2 MHz. At maximum reach there is only about a few uV difference between bits in the digital signal ,and this makes
/archives//html/RFI/2007-02/msg00010.html (11,208 bytes)

190. Re: [RFI] All band handheld receivers (score: 1)
Author: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 20:54:31 -0500
Don, k4kyv, asks VR-500 or Icom IC-R series? sniffing purposes. VR-500 would be a better deal capability, and tunes in 5 kHz Pretty well, actually. I have used several different ones to sniff interfe
/archives//html/RFI/2007-02/msg00030.html (8,736 bytes)

191. Re: [RFI] Computer Hash (score: 1)
Author: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 19:31:16 -0500
Good evening, Billy. More information is almost always better than less. Does the interference start when you connect the audio between a computer and the radio set? If so, it may be curable by addin
/archives//html/RFI/2007-02/msg00060.html (8,294 bytes)

192. Re: [RFI] Cordless 5.8ghz phones (score: 1)
Author: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 07:26:51 -0400
Hi Frank, The wireless part'll be clear, but if the base units you get are susceptible to RF on telephone and power lines, you may still have problems. If it were I (grin), I'd first clean up problem
/archives//html/RFI/2007-03/msg00007.html (7,909 bytes)

193. Re: [RFI] Television Interference (was: no subject) (score: 1)
Author: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 05:43:11 -0400
Hello, Eduardo. A filter on your transmitter will help if your transmitter is sending RF on television frequencies. It will not help if the TV set is responding to your frequency when it is not tuned
/archives//html/RFI/2007-03/msg00014.html (7,653 bytes)

194. Re: [RFI] Cordless 5.8ghz phones (score: 1)
Author: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 06:01:36 -0400
I found an RF-proof 'phone at the Marshall (MI) hamfest; it's an old Bell 500 type. The idea is if a neighbor complains I'm "interfering" with his telephone I can say "My phone doesn't hear anything!
/archives//html/RFI/2007-03/msg00015.html (9,266 bytes)

195. Re: [RFI] Sorenson DCS 55-55 PS Clean? (score: 1)
Author: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 21:51:36 -0400
Recently I spent time at work looking for a PS to use inside an EMI chamber. None of the ones on hand (nclude some older Sorensons) were RF-quiet. Just because a PS is "linear" does not make it clean
/archives//html/RFI/2007-04/msg00003.html (9,130 bytes)

196. Re: [RFI] Weather Station on 433.92? (score: 1)
Author: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 20:35:04 -0400
Lin, That falls under Part 15. 15.209 says 200 microvolts per meter at 3 meters, so it's pretty loud. A Part 15 user is responsible for stopping interference to a licensed one, of course. That's no h
/archives//html/RFI/2007-04/msg00006.html (7,396 bytes)

197. Re: [RFI] Weather Station on 433.92? (score: 1)
Author: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:58:45 -0400
Hi again, Dale, Nice to see you in Cedar Rapids. No, these really are low power, so should not be a problem for weak signal work. I understand there is at least one ATV repeater whose audio has probl
/archives//html/RFI/2007-04/msg00011.html (8,800 bytes)

198. Re: [RFI] Weather Station on 433.92? (score: 1)
Author: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:11:04 -0400
Hi Dave! Comments interspersed below. HTML to preserve formatting. Comment: Yes, IIRC, that's a European ISM frequency. Also in that range are Euro PCM radios, which show up here when tourists bring
/archives//html/RFI/2007-04/msg00012.html (9,623 bytes)

199. Re: [RFI] Long distance grounding (score: 1)
Author: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:20:17 -0400
Sometimes it helps to remember that "ground" is just a low impedance at all the frequencies we want to divert current -- and a sink that has no bad effects when we do. Glen Dash used to recommend a h
/archives//html/RFI/2007-06/msg00012.html (8,114 bytes)

200. Re: [RFI] N6CW TVI (score: 1)
Author: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 02:41:35 -0400
Terry, just a thought but if you are using a "cable box", are the TV's connected to it set on Channel 2? Cortland, KA5S other words, not the antenna _______________________________________________ RF
/archives//html/RFI/2007-06/msg00039.html (7,708 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu