Mail Archive Search: <+from:kelly@thejohnsons.ws>

Results:

References: [ +from:kelly@thejohnsons.ws: 50 ]

Total 50 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RFI] TVI (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 15:39:12 -0800 (PST); I have a Panamax strip myself. Combined with about 8 turns around a mix 77 toroid and another mix 77 toroid on my satellite dish feed I have eliminated the TVI I was getting whenever I operated 40m o; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00052.html (9,060 bytes)
22. [RFI] Plasma TVs (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 15:57:31 -0800 (PST); There's been a fair amount of discussion on this mail reflector about RFI from plasma TV's. One thing I've noticed in my research into Plasma TV's is that quite a number of them (esp. the larger ones; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00053.html (7,105 bytes)
23. Re: [RFI] Plasma TVs (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 16:53:51 -0800 (PST); Oops! Typo! I meant to say "Is it possible that most of the really noisy ones are Class A...". My point was to ask if the reason Plasma seems to be noisier is because: a) The technology is just noisi; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00054.html (8,417 bytes)
24. RE: [RFI] Plasma TVs (score: 1): Author: "Kelly Johnson" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 22:47:55 -0800; I haven't looked at any TVs in retail stores, but I've certainly looked at a lot of them advertised on the web. If you look at some of the online retailers you will see Class A and Class B devices ad; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00055.html (8,891 bytes)
25. [RFI] KW Amp on second floor (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:34:50 -0800 (PST); I'm considering buying my first amplifier (after almost 30 years barefoot). I've always heard that running your rig from the 2nd floor of your house is risky because you can't get a good ground. I've; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00056.html (7,168 bytes)
26. RE: [RFI] Quiet Shack PC Systems? (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 08:41:00 -0800 (PST); My CRT is generates birdies all over the place (esp. on 17 meters). It's a 21" CRT that I got for free so I don't want to get rid of it. Unfortunately, it's very difficult to wind the video cable aro; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00071.html (10,123 bytes)
27. Re: [RFI] Today's Wall Stree Journal front page article on hams & BPL (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:31:41 -0800 (PST); The ARRL may have been the source of some of it, BUT... I don't think ARRL was the one that painted amateur radio operators as a bunch of "old-farts" using antiquated technology that is now surpassed; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00087.html (7,555 bytes)
28. Re: [RFI] WSJ/BPL...disastrous PR! (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:44:54 -0800 (PST); Jim, you're right that this technology will have trouble competing but you're forgetting one important thing. Remember the "Internet Bubble"? Remember all the companies that had IPO's, their stock we; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00106.html (7,819 bytes)
29. Re: [RFI] Today's Wall Stree Journal front page article on hams & BPL (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:49:37 -0800 (PST); Yes. I found it interesting when I walked into a managers office on Monday and saw a copy of the "Spread Spectrum Sourcebook" on his desk. He builds GPS receivers for a living. Maybe hams are good fo; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00108.html (7,779 bytes)
30. RE: [RFI] Today's Wall Stree Journal front page article on hams & BPL (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 17:52:36 -0800 (PST); The FCC has stated that BPL "must not cause harmful interference". The BPL test sites are still bound by Part 15 requirements. There are documented cases of "harmful interference" in the BPL test sit; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00127.html (10,075 bytes)
31. [RFI] Bush and BPL (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 18:04:15 -0800 (PST); All you Bush haters out there are gonna love this article. No mention of BPL here, but I'm sure that's part of the broadband rollout plan. Better hope that interference mitigation works :-) http://ne; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00128.html (7,037 bytes)
32. RE: [RFI] Today's Wall Stree Journal front page article on hams & BPL (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:55:16 -0800 (PST); Once again, I ask: if interference has been documented in 6 different BPL test sites, then why hasn't an interference complaint been filed? Why hasn't Riley come out to investigate the claims? Why ha; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00173.html (10,123 bytes)
33. RE: [RFI] Today's Wall Stree Journal front page article on hams & BPL (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:25:39 -0800 (PST); Thank you very much for posting this to the list!! This is the kind of information I (and many others I believe) have been looking for. _______________________________________________ RFI mailing lis; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00175.html (9,243 bytes)
34. Re: [RFI] PLCA Response to WSJ Article (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 12:31:42 -0700 (PDT); So, I guess all that work going on in Raleigh to eliminate BPL interference is just being done to keep a few technicians employed? If BPL didn't cause interference, then the BPL providers in Raleigh; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00041.html (8,397 bytes)
35. [RFI] Re: [NCCC] BPL NPRM in fed register - comments due 5/3 (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 16:09:59 -0700 (PDT); Is it my imagination or is the NPRM found in the Federal Register different than the one that was released by the FCC before it made it to the Federal Register? It looks to me like the paragraph numb; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00091.html (8,212 bytes)
36. Re: [RFI] BPL Thought (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 11:21:26 -0700 (PDT); The "I don't want to get involved" or "I don't have time" attitude I've seen on the part of a large number of hams is pathetic. It seems to be the prevalent view of the local "shack-on-the-belt" crow; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00122.html (11,716 bytes)
37. Re: [RFI] No BPL in UK? (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 15:33:32 -0700 (PDT); Oh yeah, well we're smarter than that over here in the US. You know... we can make this stuff work even though every previous attempt in other countries failed. C'mon. This is America...where you can; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00126.html (8,990 bytes)
38. Re: [RFI] Protecting our frequencies (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:52:55 -0700 (PDT); Here's Corridor Systems' Comments on the BPL NPRM. http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cginative_or_pdf=pdf&id_document=6516182326 _______________________________________________ RFI mailing; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00136.html (7,326 bytes)
39. [RFI] Another NPRM Comment (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:56:08 -0700 (PDT); Oops! Cut-and-paste error. Here's the correct URL http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdf&id_document=6516182326 http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cginative_or_pdf; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00137.html (6,834 bytes)
40. Re: [RFI] Lawsuit (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 11:55:27 -0700 (PDT); It's obvious that most hams don't realize the threat. Go to the FCC ECFS website and see how many hams have bothered to file comments. Next, look at some of the comments. Most of them are no longer t; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00141.html (9,131 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]