Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kilo.mike@gte.net: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] RFI resistant telephones (score: 1)
Author: kilo.mike@gte.net (Kris Mraz)
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 05:11:37 +0000
Ed, Its all good information. Especially the info on resolving power company RFI issues. Great stuff that everyone needs to know. Appreciate it. Kris N5KM
/archives//html/RFI/2002-12/msg00019.html (7,396 bytes)

2. [RFI] Power line noise is just a nuiscence?? (score: 1)
Author: kilo.mike@gte.net (Kris Mraz)
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 16:57:27 +0000
Interesting. I've often thought in the past that someone could make a decent living at locating power-line interference just for the ham community. Invest in the latest rfi locating equipment and cha
/archives//html/RFI/2002-11/msg00048.html (7,036 bytes)

3. [RFI] FT-847 is a Part 15 Device? (score: 1)
Author: kilo.mike@gte.net (Kris Mraz)
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 21:18:36 +0000
Ed, I think the unsettling part is "Operation is subject to the condition that this device does not cause harmful interference." On the surface this appears to be pretty damning evidence for an irate
/archives//html/RFI/2002-07/msg00012.html (9,758 bytes)

4. [RFI] LCD Monitor RFI (score: 1)
Author: kilo.mike@gte.net (Kris Mraz)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 18:48:16 +0000
I wonder if this is something that the ARRL's RFI lab could address by running an RF emissions test on the various LCD (and CRT) monitors at appropriate frequencies and publishing the results. It wou
/archives//html/RFI/2001-11/msg00013.html (7,218 bytes)

5. [RFI] part 15 intentional radiators (score: 1)
Author: Kris Mraz N5KM <kilo.mike@gte.net> (Kris Mraz N5KM)
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 05:13:42 +0000
If the FCC can come down hard on part 15 intentional radiators on 2.4 Ghz why can't they come down hard on the part 15 intentional radiators that are ruining 80m CW (wireless modem jacks)? What's th
/archives//html/RFI/2001-02/msg00014.html (7,341 bytes)

6. [RFI] Assistance identifying 80m noise (score: 1)
Author: Kris Mraz N5KM <kilo.mike@gte.net> (Kris Mraz N5KM)
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2000 02:46:52 +0000
I posted this a few days ago but it apparently didn't get reflected. -- Original Message -- I'm being plagued by a noise on the 80m band. The noise is a raspy buzz that starts at the low end of 80m a
/archives//html/RFI/2000-12/msg00030.html (7,647 bytes)

7. [RFI] Assistance identifying 80m noise (score: 1)
Author: Kris Mraz N5KM <kilo.mike@gte.net> (Kris Mraz N5KM)
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2000 01:44:16 +0000
Ed, Thanks for lending your expertise to this problem. Others have mentioned PC monitor or switching power supply noise. In my case the noise is present 24 hrs a day. You say that the touch lamp is t
/archives//html/RFI/2000-12/msg00034.html (12,148 bytes)

8. [RFI] Local AM station overload (score: 1)
Author: Kris Mraz N5KM <kilo.mike@gte.net> (Kris Mraz N5KM)
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 15:06:08 +0000
All, I've been on 80m every morning for the past few weeks starting at 7am. This morning, for the first time, I'm getting fundamental overload from KAAM-AM when they switch from 1000w to 10,000w at 7
/archives//html/RFI/2000-12/msg00043.html (7,172 bytes)

9. [RFI] BPL reply comments (score: 1)
Author: Kris Mraz <kilo.mike@gte.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 01:43:12 -0500
All, I want to publicly commend the ARRL, Chris Imlay, Ed Hare and any other supporting cast members for an excellent Reply To Comments filed on August 20. Very logical and convincing. I also want to
/archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00140.html (7,925 bytes)

10. Re: [RFI] BPL reply comments (score: 1)
Author: Kris Mraz <kilo.mike@gte.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 10:09:43 -0500
Very good, Mike. And I noticed that you sent your reply directly to Current Technologies, too. Good move. Thanks. BTW, I noticed that the ARRL has refocused the objective of the Amateur Radio Interf
/archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00143.html (7,351 bytes)

11. [RFI] BPL speech: FCC commissioner's response (score: 1)
Author: Kris Mraz <kilo.mike@gte.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2003 20:45:04 -0600
I emailed to Commissioner Abernathy regarding her being a cheerleader for the BPL initiative. Here is the response I got from her legal advisor: Dear Mr. Mraz, Thank you for your interest in broadban
/archives//html/RFI/2003-11/msg00026.html (8,613 bytes)

12. Re: [RFI] InfoWorld (score: 1)
Author: Kris Mraz <kilo.mike@gte.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:20:28 -0600
Jim, Thanks for taking a lead role with this. Here's the URL for an article written in 2001 that explains why RWE of Germany and Britain's United Utilities abandoned BPL over two years ago. It also
/archives//html/RFI/2004-01/msg00031.html (7,234 bytes)

13. [RFI] Lawsuit (score: 1)
Author: Kris Mraz <kilo.mike@gte.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 22:41:45 -0500
I got word tonight from a reliable source that there's a good chance the ARRL will file a lawsuit against a power company due to sustained interference to 20m from their BPL test site. Kris N5KM ____
/archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00101.html (6,278 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu