Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:shr@swtexas.net: 53 ]

Total 53 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] W8WWV noise (score: 1)
Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:36:33 -0600
Greg, W8WWV asked me about his noise problem and I am checking on some radar and sounding systems to see if anything is out there that might make this noise. But I also thought the collective wisdom
/archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00110.html (8,610 bytes)

2. Re: [RFI] As if BPL weren't enough... (score: 1)
Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 07:29:32 -0600
At 09:02 PM 2/20/2004, you wrote: Don't bother to call the FCC about this one -- http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2004/20feb_radiostorms.htm?list129291 Tom-- I spent five years at the University of
/archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00120.html (8,621 bytes)

3. [RFI] BPL posts (score: 1)
Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 06:55:21 -0600
I just saw a couple of more-balanced articles on BPL and was wondering whether this was the place to post them-- or if there is a better reflector? --John -- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Ch
/archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00136.html (6,366 bytes)

4. [RFI] Better Balanced BPL story (score: 1)
Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 07:18:50 -0600
Tired of one-sided BPL articles? This one seems to be a little batter balanced than most. The second one I saw was not as extensive and didn't want to be pasted into a note. But if you are interested
/archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00138.html (17,046 bytes)

5. [RFI] Better Balanced BPL story (score: 1)
Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 07:26:08 -0600
Guess the reflector strips out some of the formatting. When I sent this article to myself the formatting remained intact. But sending it through the reflector mangled it just a bit. Best to go to the
/archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00139.html (7,102 bytes)

6. Re: [RFI] TVI (score: 1)
Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2004 20:00:14 -0600
At 04:07 PM 3/6/2004, Pete Smith wrote: At 04:22 PM 3/6/04 -0500, Tom Rauch wrote: By far the most effective cure would be installing an outlet strip with built in lightning protection for cable and
/archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00032.html (8,563 bytes)

7. Re: [RFI] TVI (score: 1)
Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 08:57:07 -0600
At 04:19 AM 3/7/2004, you wrote: MCM Electronics and others sell them for as little as ten or twenty dollars 73, Tom W8JI In "defense" of the $250 filter (!) it is my understanding that it has filter
/archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00035.html (8,526 bytes)

8. [RFI] BPL, Jim Haynie, and Art Bell (score: 1)
Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 13:01:53 -0600
Surprised there have not been any comments about Jim Haynie's appearance on Art Bell's syndicated "Coast to Coast" show the other night. Joe Walsh was also on with Jim and it seemed like a bit of an
/archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00085.html (10,510 bytes)

9. Re: [RFI] Today's Wall Street Journal front page article on hams & BPL (score: 1)
Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 09:40:01 -0600
Don't get me wrong; I love my hobby, but I would be embarrassed to tell someone I was "cutting edge". What part of ham radio were you thinking of? There ARE lots of examples of cutting edge technolog
/archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00095.html (10,907 bytes)

10. [RFI] WSJ & BPL (score: 1)
Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 09:51:30 -0600
For the record--I did respond to Ken Brown's WSJ article. It is not a particularly great reply, but I hope I covered some the salient points in a relatively friendly and helpful manner. I have not ye
/archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00097.html (11,687 bytes)

11. Re: [RFI] WSJ & BPL (score: 1)
Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 10:29:43 -0600
Isn't that to distinguish between the already existing PLC infrastructure and what's now called BPL. PLC already exists for quite some time. Probably so, but I was trying to instill in Ken Brown the
/archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00100.html (8,223 bytes)

12. Re: [RFI] WSJ/BPL & WiFi (score: 1)
Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 12:43:51 -0600
Jim-- Gee, thanks (I guess). It was just a quick and dirty note to feel like I had done SOMETHING. If I thought it was going to be seen by more than a few ham friends here on the RFI reflector and so
/archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00103.html (8,468 bytes)

13. Re: [RFI] BPL (score: 1)
Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 11:03:57 -0600
While I agree with W8JI that battling BPL from a ham perspective has little impact on the public and that fighting the BPL RFI issues from the perspective of more VITAL communications is much better,
/archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00144.html (9,699 bytes)

14. Re: [RFI] Investment vs. interference: BPL (score: 1)
Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 16:49:16 -0500
I am in an area that is pretty remote. I am about 25 miles from the central office for my little telephone company. SouthWest Texas Telephone http://www.swtexas.net I am also 25 miles from the neares
/archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00074.html (11,628 bytes)

15. Re: [RFI] Complex Impedance Measurement Instruments (score: 1)
Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 08:35:56 -0500
For this work, I would be quite satisfied with 5-10% accuracy. I'm currently using what I have available -- a CIA-HF loaned by K9IKZ -- and I've generated some useful data, albeit limited by the CIA-
/archives//html/RFI/2004-06/msg00001.html (7,733 bytes)

16. Re: [RFI] Editorial on BPL in Electronic Design Magazine (score: 1)
Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 07:26:48 -0500
Hey, this sounds cool - - use fiber to get the signal to an area, then WiMax to deliver to homes, and presto, no need for BPL at all. I loved the comment from Corridor -- what the heck is this busine
/archives//html/RFI/2004-08/msg00036.html (7,489 bytes)

17. RE: [RFI] wideband service availability (score: 1)
Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 23:23:46 -0500
Broadband is not as easily found here outside of Omaha. I have cable, but when I asked about DSL, then said not available-must be too far from the CO. I can throw a rock from my roof and hit the CO b
/archives//html/RFI/2004-09/msg00075.html (9,132 bytes)

18. Re: [RFI] Ethernet RFI (score: 1)
Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:00:26 -0600
Here are a couple of good sites for wiring CAT5 connectors. http://www.netspec.com/helpdesk/wiredoc.html http://www.netadmintools.com/art146.html 73 John W0UN ________________________________________
/archives//html/RFI/2005-01/msg00049.html (7,183 bytes)

19. Re: [RFI] DSL surge protection (score: 1)
Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:48:27 -0600
Protect your DSL modem with whatever you can do on the telephone line. And protect your computer by using a WiFi router to the DSL modem. That is about the best you can do to protect your computer an
/archives//html/RFI/2005-02/msg00081.html (7,970 bytes)

20. Re: [RFI] DSL surge protection (score: 1)
Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:31:44 -0600
I should have added that the power lines are above ground and the phone lines are buried. So it is counter-intuitive. --John W0UN _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@
/archives//html/RFI/2005-02/msg00085.html (8,186 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu