Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:tlthompson@qwest.net: 66 ]

Total 66 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [RFI] A visit with the power company. (score: 1)
Author: Tom Thompson <tlthompson@qwest.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 18:13:32 -0600
/I didn't spend the time to research medical but in Colorado those grow operations NEVER happen in residential areas. // / In Boulder, CO I have tracked down 5 growers in a residential neighborhood.
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00231.html (10,436 bytes)

42. Re: [RFI] Shielded vs unshielded loops. (score: 1)
Author: Tom Thompson <tlthompson@qwest.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 18:20:54 -0600
Ken, You do not need a shielded loop. You can build a loop in a few hours. See: http://tomthompson.com/radio/RecievingLoop/loop.html I can track down an RFI source verry easily. The RFI is vertically
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00233.html (7,588 bytes)

43. Re: [RFI] Shielded vs unshielded loops - difference (score: 1)
Author: Tom Thompson <tlthompson@qwest.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 13:53:39 -0600
Hi Ken, One thing to keep in mind when you choose a loop is the antenna factor. I believe your RFI is mainly on 80m. A small (10") loop that is not tuned will have a terrible antenna factor on 80 m.
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00262.html (9,787 bytes)

44. Re: [RFI] Shielded vs unshielded loops - difference (score: 1)
Author: Tom Thompson <tlthompson@qwest.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 22:08:08 -0600
Several of you have shown interest in the loop antenna. I have updated my web page to show more details. If you have it cached, you may have to refresh it. The URL is: http://tomthompson.com/radio/Re
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00264.html (11,503 bytes)

45. Re: [RFI] RFI Digest, Vol 134, Issue 39 (score: 1)
Author: Tom Thompson <tlthompson@qwest.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 22:18:04 -0600
Don, Your approach is right on. When I knock on the door I essentially tell the person the following and leave a written notice if they are uncooperative: Official Notice of Interference Hi, I have t
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00266.html (9,719 bytes)

46. Re: [RFI] Shielded vs unshielded loops - difference (score: 1)
Author: Tom Thompson <tlthompson@qwest.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 23:41:26 -0600
Ken, The balun is just several turns of the coax through the #43 ferrite core material. Tom Several of you have shown interest in the loop antenna. I have updated my web page to show more details. If
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00269.html (9,134 bytes)

47. Re: [RFI] Shielded vs unshielded loops - difference (score: 1)
Author: Tom Thompson <tlthompson@qwest.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 23:42:16 -0600
Sorry, Dave. I just made the prototype shown. Tom THank you for sharing that build! Do you by chance have any PC boards for the RX? _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RF
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00270.html (8,450 bytes)

48. Re: [RFI] RFI Digest, Vol 134, Issue 39 (score: 1)
Author: Tom Thompson <tlthompson@qwest.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 08:04:55 -0600
Hi Dale, I had one case where the people denied any culpability, so I looked up the address in the tax records and found out the property was a rental. I contacted the landlord who contacted the rent
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00276.html (8,493 bytes)

49. Re: [RFI] Shielded vs unshielded loops - difference (score: 1)
Author: Tom Thompson <tlthompson@qwest.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 08:28:48 -0600
Hi Dave, I used #43 because I had it on hand and it gave a little more choking impedance on 40m than #31 material. The feedline is so short compared to a wavelength that it probably makes little diff
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00277.html (8,792 bytes)

50. Re: [RFI] Shielded vs unshielded loops - difference (score: 1)
Author: Tom Thompson <tlthompson@qwest.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 10:20:49 -0600
Ken, I wouldn't worry too much about the balun. I think you will find the DFing very easy with a little practice. I am glad Larry was able to help you. He is a very sharp engineer and has done a lot
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00279.html (10,123 bytes)

51. Re: [RFI] RFI Digest, Vol 134, Issue 39 (score: 1)
Author: Tom Thompson <tlthompson@qwest.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 15:52:13 -0600
Yo are welcome, Dave. I am glad to share. As you can see, unfortunately, I have spent a lot of time on RFI mitigation:-( Tom Thank you for sharing your process. It helps... I am working with an older
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00287.html (8,120 bytes)

52. Re: [RFI] Link-coupled loop - more. (score: 1)
Author: tlthompson <tlthompson@qwest.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 18:41:42 -0600
Charlie, What I do is null the signal with the loop. Since the RFI signals all seem to be vertically polarized, You are looking through the loop in the direction of the nulled signal. I site a distan
/archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00034.html (11,667 bytes)

53. Re: [RFI] Link-coupled loop - more. (score: 1)
Author: tlthompson <tlthompson@qwest.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 19:55:53 -0600
Hi Charlie, I bought a middle of the road compass from REI. I did not get the one with a mirror, but that might be helpful. Tom W0IVJ OK, understand. OK on that. We all have our methods and that can
/archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00036.html (9,083 bytes)

54. Re: [RFI] Listen to a Sample of what Plasma TV RFI Sounds Like (score: 1)
Author: Tom Thompson <tlthompson@qwest.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 08:05:54 -0600
Does anyone know whether the variation in sound on this recording is due to the RFI changing or the receiver being tuned? Tom W0IVJ sound of broadband plasma TV generated noise. This noise averaged 5
/archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00054.html (9,321 bytes)

55. Re: [RFI] Listen to a Sample of what Plasma TV RFI Sounds Like (score: 1)
Author: Tom Thompson <tlthompson@qwest.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 17:18:24 -0600
Thanks, Rob...really helpful!! Tom On 4/7/2014 2:22 PM, Rob Atkinson wrote: There are a few variables you need to be aware of with reception of PTV RFI. It sounds different depending on whether or no
/archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00068.html (10,942 bytes)

56. Re: [RFI] Update for RFI/Grow Light Problem (score: 1)
Author: Tom Thompson <tlthompson@qwest.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 17:19:39 -0600
Thanks for the update, Tom. Your kind of followup is helpful to all. Tom W0IVJ Got a call today by a lady from the FCC and asked me if I still had the RFI issue. Apparently, the RFI ceased about four
/archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00069.html (8,814 bytes)

57. Re: [RFI] broadcasting interference (score: 1)
Author: Tom Thompson <tlthompson@qwest.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 14:40:10 -0600
Hi Jorge, I would first confirm the reception on a different antenna and receiver. Also, see if it occurs every 10 kHz below 3500. It sounds like it might be in their equipment. I recall a similar si
/archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00098.html (8,043 bytes)

58. Re: [RFI] Local noise - another report. (score: 1)
Author: Tom Thompson <tlthompson@qwest.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 19:06:51 -0600
Ken, If you can get a fix on your predominant noise, your best bet is to walk in that direction with your loop. If health reasons preclude this, just walk as far as you can and start from that spot t
/archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00112.html (10,150 bytes)

59. Re: [RFI] More on "my" noise. (score: 1)
Author: Tom Thompson <tlthompson@qwest.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 13:23:36 -0600
It could be that the broadband noise is local and the STANAG signal at 4286.3 kHz is strong enough to poke through the broadband noise and they are not related at all. Tom W0IVJ Dale, k9vuj The wide
/archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00228.html (18,618 bytes)

60. Re: [RFI] Question for all and ARRL (score: 1)
Author: Tom Thompson <tlthompson@qwest.net>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 14:01:35 -0600
Hi Dave, I have found all of the grow light stores here in the Boulder, CO area to be extremely friendly and helpful to the extent that they let me make measurements in their store so I could develop
/archives//html/RFI/2014-05/msg00047.html (9,264 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu