Mail Archive Search: <+from:wa4tukhr at comcast.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:wa4tukhr: 24 ] [ at (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ comcast.net: 12 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Broadband over Power Line Video (score: 175): Author: wa4tukhr at comcast.net (Patrick A. Thompson Sr.); Date: Wed Aug 6 23:05:22 2003; I made comments during the earlier BPL NOI comment time. I've sent donations to the ARRL BPL defense fund. Is it worthwhile to file "reply comments"? As an individual what resources can I bring to be; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00017.html (7,750 bytes)
2. [RFI] RE: Concerning BPL video (score: 175): Author: wa4tukhr at comcast.net (Patrick A. Thompson Sr.); Date: Sat Aug 9 13:57:47 2003; Its pretty obvious, using your words, why there are no complaints filed from US hams regarding BPL. This particular form of BPL has yet to be deployed except in small test areas. You are at least cor; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00049.html (12,030 bytes)
3. [RFI] RE: Concerning BPL video (score: 175): Author: wa4tukhr at comcast.net (Patrick A. Thompson Sr.); Date: Sat Aug 9 16:23:02 2003; I would be delighted to be wrong in misreading motives, and since I do not know Mike in any other form other than what I might infer from his posts, there is certainly room for misjudging motives. So; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00057.html (10,605 bytes)
4. [RFI] BPL Support? (score: 175): Author: wa4tukhr at comcast.net (Patrick A. Thompson Sr.); Date: Tue Aug 12 20:04:21 2003; Does this mean that you cannot use the ECFS web form for reply comments? You must use the file upload method? Pat wa4tuk; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00088.html (8,298 bytes)
5. [RFI] BPL Support? (score: 175): Author: wa4tukhr at comcast.net (Patrick A. Thompson Sr.); Date: Tue Aug 12 21:15:14 2003; I guess I should asked specifically about the ECFS Express page. My reply ended up branded "Comment" rather than "Reply to Comment" because there was no provision for stating document type. You can g; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00090.html (8,382 bytes)
6. [RFI] BPL Support? (score: 175): Author: wa4tukhr at comcast.net (Patrick A. Thompson Sr.); Date: Tue Aug 12 22:07:03 2003; I'll resend and hope for the best. The original was done in MS Word anyway. Thanks! Pat wa4tuk; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00092.html (8,349 bytes)
7. [RFI] BPL alternatives(amended) (score: 175): Author: wa4tukhr at comcast.net (Patrick A. Thompson Sr.); Date: Fri Aug 15 21:16:55 2003; When and if it becomes necessary, I hope the ARRL will spin off a political lobbying group. Model this after whatever organization you think is effective. As for what to do now, support the BPL fund; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00120.html (9,313 bytes)
8. [RFI] BPL alternatives (score: 175): Author: wa4tukhr at comcast.net (Patrick A. Thompson Sr.); Date: Sat Aug 16 15:16:18 2003; I agree! Sign me up! Pat wa4tuk; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00128.html (7,753 bytes)
9. [RFI] RE: A Serious Threat (score: 175): Author: wa4tukhr at comcast.net (Patrick A. Thompson Sr.); Date: Wed Jun 11 19:40:10 2003; What we need from ARRL, and I hope what we will get, is a strong effort to defeat BPL. I've already made comments using the short form FCC comments page, but I suspect that is not going to be enough.; /archives//html/RFI/2003-06/msg00039.html (11,063 bytes)
10. [RFI] PLC Testing (score: 175): Author: wa4tukhr at comcast.net (Patrick A. Thompson Sr.); Date: Sun May 25 21:54:26 2003; I think this PLC garbage was "addressed and resolved" in most countries by not allowing it to happen. As far as complaints causing cash loss to the power distributors, this is complete wishful thinki; /archives//html/RFI/2003-05/msg00034.html (9,752 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]