- 1. [RFI] 433.92 remote control, legal? (score: 1)
- Author: Ray LaRue <w4byg@att.net>
- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 17:39:45 +0000
- Just purchased a satellite actuator remote control which the spec sheet inside states it operates on 433.92 MHz. Low power it is and very low duty time on, but curious, is this legal? Ray, W4BYG -- T
- /archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00014.html (7,218 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RFI] 433.92 remote control, legal? (score: 1)
- Author: Tom <k8tb@bosscher.org>
- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 13:45:19 -0400
- Yes. it is used under Part 15. I have an Icom IC-9700. Whats really fun is to have that on the Sat antenna, which is CP, and listen from 433.8 t0 .95. I can hear HUNDREDS of signals. I've even dialed
- /archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00015.html (7,445 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RFI] 433.92 remote control, legal? (score: 1)
- Author: KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 11:24:54 -0700
- "is this legal?" Absolutely! There's been a nearly 2 MHz wide ISDM band there for thirty years that I've known of, and, as Hams, we aren't even the primary users of the band. https://fccid.io/frequen
- /archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00016.html (8,004 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RFI] 433.92 remote control, legal? (score: 1)
- Author: David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 18:32:08 +0000
- And now I have multiple 'research' high-powered wind profiler radar emissions out of Longmont, Colorado to deal with. Dave - WØLEV -- *Dave - WØLEV* *Just Let Darwin Work* ___________________________
- /archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00017.html (8,618 bytes)
- 5. Re: [RFI] 433.92 remote control, legal? (score: 1)
- Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
- Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 13:53:51 +0000
- Part 15 has a section on periodic radiates that permit relatively high power to be used for remote control, weather stations and some warehouse industrial equipment. Yes. it is used under Part 15. I
- /archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00020.html (8,842 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu