Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Cable\s+TV\s+Interference\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Cable\s+TV\s+Interference\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Cable TV Interference (score: 1): Author: wb3fsr@home.com (Peter D. Vouvounas); Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 09:20:21 -0500; Morning ALL, Can anyone share their thoughts on how best to determine if cable TV radiation is within spec... I am receiving a carrier on 145.250 MHz generally around S7-S9 signal strength = approx.; /archives//html/RFI/2001-12/msg00008.html (9,199 bytes)
2. [RFI] Cable TV Interference (score: 1): Author: WD8ARZ" <wd8arz@ix.netcom.com (WD8ARZ); Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 13:08:07 -0500; 145.255, then you also have a risk of getting in to the cable by the same leakage point. We are not supposed to be able to get into their cable at all. Any leakage into the ham band is unacceptable; /archives//html/RFI/2001-12/msg00009.html (9,019 bytes)
3. [RFI] Cable TV Interference (score: 1): Author: dgsvetan@rockwellcollins.com (dgsvetan@rockwellcollins.com); Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 12:49:48 -0600; Peter, I have fought the battle before, in the Chicago suburban area, prior to coming out here to Iowa. As a point of interest, I imagine that if you tune your ham FM receiver up to 149.750, you will; /archives//html/RFI/2001-12/msg00010.html (14,464 bytes)
4. [RFI] Cable TV Interference (score: 1): Author: james.skjervem@hqasc.army.mil (james.skjervem@hqasc.army.mil); Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 14:08:08 -0700; All: Some interesting reading regarding cable TV leakage can be found on the Web from Communications Technology magazine (a cable industry publication, from the SCTE that Dale mentioned) in August-De; /archives//html/RFI/2001-12/msg00011.html (15,553 bytes)
5. [RFI] Cable TV Interference (score: 1): Author: ka5s@earthlink.net (Cortland Richmond); Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 07:29:44 +0800; The FCC limit is not a requirement; it is a maximum. In the event of harmful interference, the cable company is _supposed_ to work to reduce it. You can build, buy or borrow a tuned dipole. Use about; /archives//html/RFI/2001-12/msg00013.html (9,164 bytes)
6. [RFI] Cable TV Interference (score: 1): Author: wb3fsr@home.com (Peter D. Vouvounas); Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 19:12:13 -0500; First I would like to thank all of you for some very excellent detail and references regarding Cable TV interference. Next would one of you be so kind in checking my calculations as follows: Measurin; /archives//html/RFI/2001-12/msg00014.html (7,833 bytes)
7. [RFI] Cable TV Interference (score: 1): Author: w1rfi@arrl.org (Hare,Ed, W1RFI); Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 13:19:50 -0500; I will add these both as links to the ARRL Web page on cable TVI: http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/HTML/catvi/index.html If you know of good links like this that could be added to our web pages, let me k; /archives//html/RFI/2001-12/msg00015.html (19,450 bytes)
8. [RFI] Cable TV Interference (score: 1): Author: wb3fsr@home.com (Peter D. Vouvounas); Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 10:21:19 -0500; This message posted on-behalf of W5NA (awaiting his password) [REN] WB3FSR There have been numerous posts on this reflector concerning signal leakage from a Cable TV System some of which are not enti; /archives//html/RFI/2001-12/msg00024.html (11,566 bytes)
9. [RFI] Cable TV Interference (score: 1): Author: w1rfi@arrl.org (Hare,Ed, W1RFI); Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 13:48:54 -0500; Hello, Peter, Good advice all. I will add a couple of points. If a leak BELOW the FCC max limits causes actual harmful interference to a radio service, the cable operator needs to resolve the interfe; /archives//html/RFI/2001-12/msg00025.html (15,001 bytes)
10. [RFI] Cable TV Interference (score: 1): Author: james.skjervem@hqasc.army.mil (james.skjervem@hqasc.army.mil); Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 12:03:54 -0700; Good summary - just a small leakage limit correction is in order: Frequency less than or equal to 54 MHz and greater than 216 MHz, the limit is 15 microvolts/meter at 30 meters (100 feet), and betwee; /archives//html/RFI/2001-12/msg00026.html (12,587 bytes)
11. [RFI] Cable TV Interference (score: 1): Author: wb3fsr@home.com (Peter D. Vouvounas); Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 14:29:04 -0500; Thanks Jim, I'm pretty well versed with info in this area as described.... As the earlier post indicated, I'm just passing on (Leon's comments, W5NA) Section §76.605(12) of the regs states the l; /archives//html/RFI/2001-12/msg00027.html (8,479 bytes)
12. [RFI] Cable TV Interference (score: 1): Author: "David C. Hallam" <dhallam@rapidsys.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:48:01 -0400; An update with my problems with cable TV interference. 12:00 PM Receiving cable channel 38 at 4.821 MHz 4:20 PM Receiving cable channel 11 at 4,831 MHz Cable company, Knology, came out yesterday and; /archives//html/RFI/2006-09/msg00031.html (7,018 bytes)
13. Re: [RFI] Cable TV Interference (score: 1): Author: "Leigh L Klotz, Jr." <Leigh@WA5ZNU.org>; Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:36:29 -0700; _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi; /archives//html/RFI/2006-09/msg00032.html (7,946 bytes)
14. Re: [RFI] Cable TV Interference (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:57:42 -0400; David, TV sets use 4.5MHz IF and some subcarrier frequencies in that range and high as an FM (audio) IF. I can hear the sound carrier from what I suspect is the composite video cable connects betwee; /archives//html/RFI/2006-09/msg00033.html (8,106 bytes)
15. Re: [RFI] Cable TV Interference (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:58:25 -0400; David, TV sets use 4.5MHz IF and some subcarrier frequencies in that range and higher as an FM (audio) IF. I can hear the sound carrier from what I suspect is the composite video cable connects betw; /archives//html/RFI/2006-09/msg00034.html (7,674 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]