Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Daisychaining\s+Grounding\s+\[Was\:\s+DigiKeyer\s+II\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Daisychaining\s+Grounding\s+\[Was\:\s+DigiKeyer\s+II\]\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RFI] Daisychaining Grounding [Was: DigiKeyer II] (score: 1): Author: "qrv@kd4e.com" <qrv@kd4e.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 17:34:09 -0500; Isn't it more of a question of how? Properly implemented it may be fine, sloppily implemented it could create problems - of course that's true of all grounding systems. On 12/19/2013 1:39 PM, EDWARDS; /archives//html/RFI/2013-12/msg00110.html (9,539 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] Daisychaining Grounding [Was: DigiKeyer II] (score: 1): Author: CR <ka5s@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 09:39:30 -0500; Well, if the objective is to keep all interconnected equipment at the same potential, we want connections some small fraction of a wavelength long. Lead inductance is the problem; EMC Engineer and au; /archives//html/RFI/2013-12/msg00114.html (8,946 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]