- 1. Re: [RFI] EMI resistant phones (score: 1)
- Author: silberman@earthlink.net
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 13:07:06 -0400 (EDT)
- I've had good luck with Radio Shack's cordless models. I have two of them in the house and no problems. Others are not so trouble free even with lots of toroids. Steve W2KN Send RFI mailing list subm
- /archives//html/RFI/2005-06/msg00002.html (8,658 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RFI] EMI resistant phones (score: 1)
- Author: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 13:47:17 -0400
- I can't vouch for RS products particularly, but I think the "cordless phone" approach is a good one for RFI considerations. The latest digital phones operate in "networks". I have a 2.4 GHz digital b
- /archives//html/RFI/2005-06/msg00003.html (7,822 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RFI] EMI resistant phones (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 12:12:59 -0400
- I suspect there will be some problems with 2.4 GHz phones if one operates in the 2.4 GHz ham band (some of us do!) with any power. I have had 2.4 cordless phomes disrupt WiFi routers, but the phones
- /archives//html/RFI/2005-06/msg00004.html (6,748 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RFI] EMI resistant phones (score: 1)
- Author: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 13:48:56 -0400
- Use the 5 GHz phones if you're using 2.4 for ham work, by all means. However, I've had no trouble with my microwave oven or phones when I set up my WiFi on channel 11. (If I hold my phone handset rig
- /archives//html/RFI/2005-06/msg00005.html (8,094 bytes)
- 5. Re: [RFI] EMI resistant phones (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:06:27 -0400
- Martin: I have not yet operated on 2.4 GHz for general ham activity, but I do use the Band to establish a network link to a friend about a mile away. My goal, however, is to be on 2.4 SSB/CW and work
- /archives//html/RFI/2005-06/msg00007.html (8,605 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu