Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+FCC\s+fines\s+station\s+for\s+exceeding\s+RF\s+field\s+strength\s+limits$andother\s+things$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+FCC\s+fines\s+station\s+for\s+exceeding\s+RF\s+field\s+strength\s+limits$andother\s+things$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RFI] FCC fines station for exceeding RF field strength limits(andother things) (score: 1): Author: "Jim P" <jvpoll@dallas.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:35:55 -0600; It seems to me this was warranted; reading the history or 'background' for this particular order a few months back now IIRC some portion of the 'radiating' antenna structure was mounted at observatio; /archives//html/RFI/2005-02/msg00097.html (9,299 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] FCC fines station for exceeding RF field strength limits(andother things) (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:24:34 -0600; Yeah, but $25K doesn't even qualify as a slap on the wrist! Jim Brown _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/; /archives//html/RFI/2005-02/msg00098.html (7,339 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]