Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Followup\s+\-\s+RE\:\s+RF\s+resistant\s+TV\,\s+DVD\,\s+\&\s+Surround\s+Sound\s+\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Followup - RE: RF resistant TV, DVD, & Surround Sound ? (score: 1)
Author: k4ar@arrl.net (Bert Rollen - K4AR)
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 18:33:04 -0500
Hi All, Some follow-up on my question. I did decide to carry my triband HT with me to test TVs, much to my wife's chagrin..until I demonstrated on my TV in the shack. Test was performed simply by pas
/archives//html/RFI/2002-12/msg00053.html (8,286 bytes)

2. [RFI] Followup - RE: RF resistant TV, DVD, & Surround Sound ? (score: 1)
Author: w7ti@dslextreme.com (Bill Turner)
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 17:46:02 -0800
_________________________________________________________ I question the usefulness of this in a real-life situation. In your in-store experiment, the amount of RF energy picked up by each TV is high
/archives//html/RFI/2002-12/msg00054.html (7,918 bytes)

3. [RFI] Followup - RE: RF resistant TV, DVD, & Surround Sound ? (score: 1)
Author: k0il@arrl.net" <k0il@arrl.net (Ed - K0iL)
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 19:28:37 -0600
I also thought the same thing about those in-store distribution amps; they're usually DC-light with no selectivity. When digital & HDTV units first came in to a local Mega-mart here, the distribution
/archives//html/RFI/2002-12/msg00056.html (9,607 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu